In this blog post, I’d like to share some insights many software developers overlook. It’s about Gherkin scenarios in Behavior-Driven Development (BDD). The quality of your Gherkin scenarios can make or break your BDD efforts. Yet, few developers understand what constitutes a good or bad Gherkin scenario.
Gherkin is a simple yet powerful language for describing software behavior. It allows teams to write clear and understandable specifications to share among stakeholders. However, writing effective Gherkin scenarios is as much an art as a science; it’s crucial to understand the right (and wrong) ways to craft them.
This post will delve into the anatomy of good and bad Gherkin scenarios with specific examples. From user login to product search to placing an order, we’ll dissect nine scenarios to help you understand what works and doesn’t.
By analyzing these examples, you will better understand the principles of effective Gherkin scenario writing. You’ll be able to identify common pitfalls and learn how to avoid them in your own scenarios.
Good Gherkin Scenarios
Scenario 1: User Login
Feature: User Login
As a registered user
I want to log in to the system
So that I can access my account
Scenario: Successful Login
Given I am on the login page
When I enter valid credentials
And I click the login button
Then I should be redirected to my account dashboard
Why it’s good:Â This scenario clearly defines the desired behavior of the system when a user attempts to log in with valid credentials. Each step is clear, concise, and directly tied to an action or outcome.
Scenario 2: Adding an Item to the Shopping Cart
Feature: Shopping Cart
As an online shopper
I want to add items to my shopping cart
So that I can purchase them later
Scenario: Adding an Item to the Cart
Given I am on a product page
When I click the "Add to Cart" button
Then the item should be added to my shopping cart
Why it’s good:Â This scenario describes a fundamental e-commerce behavior. It’s straightforward, easy to understand, and directly maps to a user action and expected outcome.
Scenario 3: Searching for a Product
Feature: Product Search
As an online shopper
I want to search for a product
So that I can find what I'm looking for quickly
Scenario: Successful Product Search
Given I am on the home page
When I enter a product name into the search bar
And I click the search button
Then I should see a list of products that match my search
Why it’s good:Â This scenario clearly outlines the expected behavior of the search functionality, including the action of searching and the expected outcome.
Bad Gherkin Scenarios
Scenario 1: User Login
Feature: User Login
Scenario: Login
Given I am on the site
When I log in
Then I am logged in
Why it’s bad:Â This scenario is too vague, it doesn’t specify what “logging in” means or what it looks like to be “logged in.”
Scenario 2: Adding an Item to the Shopping Cart
Feature: Shopping Cart
Scenario: Adding an Item to the Cart
Given I am on the site
When I add an item
Then it is added
Why it’s bad:Â This scenario is unclear and lacks specific actions or outcomes. It doesn’t specify where the user is on the site or what it means for an item to be “added.”
Scenario 3: Searching for a Product
Feature: Product Search
Scenario: Searching for a Product
Given I am on the site
When I search
Then I get results
Why it’s bad:Â This scenario is too ambiguous. It doesn’t specify what the user is searching for or what “getting results” looks like.
Scenario 4: User Registration
Feature: User Registration
Scenario: Registration
Given I want to register
When I register
Then I am registered
Why it’s bad:Â This scenario is overly simplistic and lacks specific steps. It doesn’t specify how a user registers or what it means to be “registered.”
Scenario 5: Placing an Order
Feature: Placing an Order
Scenario: Placing an Order
Given I have items in my cart
When I place an order
Then I have placed an order
Why it’s bad:Â This scenario is too vague. It doesn’t specify the steps involved in placing an order or what it looks like when an order has been placed.
Scenario 6: User Logout
Feature: User Logout
Scenario: Logout
Given I am logged in
When I log out
Then I am logged out
Why it’s bad:Â This scenario is overly simplistic and lacks specific steps. It doesn’t specify what “logging out” means or what it looks like to be “logged out.”
Conclusion
Mastering the art of Gherkin scenarios is a critical skill in Behavior-Driven Development. Yet, it’s a skill that many developers, unfortunately, fail to acquire. By understanding the differences between good and bad scenarios, you can significantly improve the effectiveness of your BDD efforts.
Clear and concise Gherkin scenarios lead to better communication, fewer misunderstandings, and better software. So, the next time you write a Gherkin scenario, remember these examples. Because a well-crafted Gherkin scenario is more than just a specification—it’s the blueprint for success in your software development project.
If you want to learn more about this topic, here are two courses I have authored on Pluralsight.
Stay tuned for more insights and tips on improving your software development skills. Until then, happy coding!
Reference:Â Pinal Dave (https://blog.sqlauthority.com)