Answer simple quiz at the end of the blog post and –
Every day one winner from India will get Joes 2 Pros Volume 4.
Every day one winner from United States will get Joes 2 Pros Volume 4.
Using Check Option
CHECK OPTION is a very handy tool we can use with our views. If I give you the definition right away and you don’t already know what it does then is just confusing. However the examples make perfect sense. So let’s save the definition for the end of this post. First let’s look at the creation of the vHighValueGrants view.
CREATE VIEW vHighValueGrants AS SELECT GrantName, EmpID, Amount FROM [Grant] WHERE Amount > 20000
JProCo already offered to do a $1,000 match for each grant larger than $20,000. The $1,000 match is currently included in our vHighValueGrants amounts as seen in the figure below.
We have just been informed that the campaign didn’t receive the necessary approval from the stakeholders. Therefore, we must remove all of the $1,000 matching amounts. After we run this UPDATE statement, the grants will all be returned to their baseline values.
UPDATE vHighValueGrants SET Amount = Amount - 1000
The large grants are decremented by $1,000 and thus returned to their baseline values. The $1000 increase has been removed as seen in this figure below.
Suppose you accidentally ran the decrement step twice. Before we “accidentally” run the UPDATE statement again in order to create this scenario, let’s consider the amounts currently shown by the view. The smallest grant in the vHighValueGrants view is $21,000. If we rerun the UPDATE statement, this grant will become $20,000. Recall that each grant must be greater than $20,000 in order to appear in the view.
Run the UPDATE statement again and then run a SELECT statement to see all of the records in the vHighValueGrants view. The $21,000 grant (contributed by Big 6’s Foundation %) was reduced to $20,000 and thus has fallen out of the view. Now that this grant has fallen outside the criteria of vHighValueGrants, the view no longer has the ability to “see” or manipulate this record using DML statements. For the five remaining grants, you can correct their amounts and reverse the “accidental” run of the UPDATE statement by incrementing each grant by $1000. However, the only way to correct the amount of the missing grant is by running an UPDATE statement directly against the Grant table. There are only 5 large grants remaining in the view after the second $1000 decrement.
This action was clearly a mistake. We didn’t intend to remove a record from the view, but as it is currently configured, vHighValueGrants isn’t protected against these kinds of mistakes. In order to prevent data updates which would cause records to disappear from our view, we can either place a trigger on the Grant table, or we can use CHECK OPTION.
CREATE TRIGGER trg_UpdateGrant ON dbo.[Grant] AFTER UPDATE AS BEGIN IF EXISTS( SELECT * FROM Inserted ins INNER JOIN Deleted del ON ins.GrantName = del.GrantName WHERE del.Amount > 20000 AND ins.Amount <= 20000) ROLLBACK TRAN END
If you create the trigger and then attempt to decrement the vHighValueGrants view, you’ll find that the trigger will not allow the transaction to fall to $20,000 and thus it won’t meet the criteria of the vHighValueGrants view.
The trigger has protected our view. The transaction which attempted to reduce a large grant from $21,000 to $20,000 was forbidden and ended in the trigger.
But let’s recognize that the trigger would also prevent any existing grant from ever being changed to an amount $20,000, or lower. In other words, the trigger is so restrictive that even a DBA would be disallowed from directly updating the Grant table if the change would reduce an existing grant amount to become $20,000 or lower. The trigger is more restrictive than we intended.
Our goal was simply to restrict users from making an accidental data change through the view which would result in a grant being removed from the view. Let’s reattempt our goal by using CHECK OPTION by rebuilding the vHighValueGrants view to include CHECK OPTION.
This tells the view to disallow data changes through the view which would cause any record to fall outside of the criteria of the view. Does it work? Now attempt to decrement though the view and the CHECK OPTION will block you. Using the code below you get the following error message.
UPDATE vHighValueGrants SET Amount = Amount – 1000
Msg 550, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The attempted insert or update failed because the target view either specifies WITH CHECK OPTION or spans a view that specifies WITH CHECK OPTION and one or more rows resulting from the operation did not qualify under the CHECK OPTION constraint.
The statement has been terminated.
You will however be allowed to update to the table directly.
UPDATE [Grants] SET Amount = Amount – 1000
OK as promised here is the short definition or description of what CHECK OPTION does for views. Each time a DML statement is run against the view, CHECK OPTION validates that the resulting record set will be true to the SELECT statement which built the view. If a modification would remove a record defined by the view, then CHECK OPTION prevents the transaction from being committed.
Note: If you want to setup the sample JProCo database on your system you can watch this video. For this post you will want to run the SQLProgrammingChapter5.1Setup.sql script from Volume 4.
Question 23
You have a table named dbo.Sales. You need to create three views from the sales table.
vSalesSeattle
vSalesBoston
vSalesSpokane
Each view will be used by each region to make changes to their rows. One day a Seattle sales manager updated his sales data to have a new LocationID and the record showed up on the vSalesBoston view. Changes made to the vSalesSeattle view must not be made in a way that the record falls outside of the scope of the view. Which view should you create for Region1?
- CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH DIFFERENTIAL - CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH CHECK OPTION - CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT SalesID,OrderQty,SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1 - CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
WITH NOCHECK
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
Rules:
Please leave your answer in comment section below with correct option, explanation and your country of resident.
Every day one winner will be announced from United States.
Every day one winner will be announced from India.
A valid answer must contain country of residence of answerer.
Please check my facebook page for winners name and correct answer.
Every day one winner from India will get Joes 2 Pros Volume 4.
Every day one winner from United States will get Joes 2 Pros Volume 4.
The contest is open till next blog post shows up at which is next day GTM+2.5.
Reference: Pinal Dave (https://blog.sqlauthority.com)
77 Comments. Leave new
Correct answer is No. 2
— Venkatesh Prabu G || Bangalore || India
The Correct Answer is :
2.CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH CHECK OPTION
Explanation:
The WITH CHECK OPTION ensures that the RegionID be not changed/updated, which will make a record listed for the VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle, to be moved out of the list.
Country:
India
Hi,
The correct option is : 2
CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH CHECK OPTION
As we want to ensure that the changes made to the vSalesSeattle view must not be made in a way that the record falls outside of the scope of the view
Name: Hema Chaudhry
Country: India
The correct option is option 2 i.e.
CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH CHECK OPTION
india
Correct Answer is: 2
2.CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH CHECK OPTION
WITH CHECK OPTION -> During insert/update, it forces all data modification statements executed against the view to follow the criteria set within select_statement. When a row is modified through a view, the WITH CHECK OPTION makes sure the data remains visible through the view after the modification is committed.
Country: India
Answer is :
2.CREATE VIEW dbo.vSalesSeattle
AS
SELECT SalesID, OrderQty, SalespersonID, RegionID
FROM dbo.Sales
WHERE RegionID = 1
WITH CHECK OPTION
Vinay
Pune, India
2nd Option is correct
WITH CHECK OPTION is a clause on the CREATE VIEW statement that specifies the level of checking to be done when inserting or updating data through a view. If the option is specified, every row that is inserted or updated through the view must conform to the definition of that view.
SANTOSHKUMAR SINGH
Mumbai, India
Option 2 is correct
WITH CHECK OPTION
Chaitanya
Hyderabad, India
Option :2
From USA
Correct answer is option 2 which checks that any DML performed on the table does not invalidate the view result.
Vaishali Jain
Hyderabad, India.
hi,
if we insert or update a view then will the base table also reflects or not?
option 2 is correct
i am from india
#2! Great explanation. USA.
Answer is the option #2 (with check option) with following reasons: –
1. WITH DIFFERENTIAL: – option is supported only with backup related activities and this option is invalid with view creation. Hence it generates the error while script is executed.
2. WITH CHECK OPTION: – is placed in the last of the view creation script. It disallows any DML operation subject to a view, which may cause to eliminate a particular record from view after firing any DML option.
3.WITH SCHEMABINDING: – is used to protect the schema of underline object(s). Hence when the view/object is run then it does not show the error message like that the “column does not exist”.
4. WITH NOCHECK: – is used whether a particular constraint should not be checked while performing some DML operation.
Please add any useful information in case if missed something.