<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; What is Hekaton? &#8211; Simple Words Explanation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Schievink</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/#comment-449143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Schievink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=22045#comment-449143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good news.
More about it here: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/hekaton-122012.aspx

This will be a big boost for the transient pieces of OLTP applications. Can&#039;t wait to start using this!

Do you expect it will be included in SQL Server 2012 R2 ( due next year if I&#039;m correct) , or will we need to wait longer ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good news.<br />
More about it here: <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/hekaton-122012.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/hekaton-122012.aspx</a></p>
<p>This will be a big boost for the transient pieces of OLTP applications. Can&#8217;t wait to start using this!</p>
<p>Do you expect it will be included in SQL Server 2012 R2 ( due next year if I&#8217;m correct) , or will we need to wait longer ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yassine Elouati</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/#comment-403265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yassine Elouati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=22045#comment-403265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snehal, I agree with you. That was my first reaction. It is implemented as a fancy DBCC PINTABLE with modification to locking which bite us in the rear during high concurrency.
I wonder what they did regarding compilation related lock thresholds. If transaction processing increases by an order of magnitude will we be killed by dynamic queries for example?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snehal, I agree with you. That was my first reaction. It is implemented as a fancy DBCC PINTABLE with modification to locking which bite us in the rear during high concurrency.<br />
I wonder what they did regarding compilation related lock thresholds. If transaction processing increases by an order of magnitude will we be killed by dynamic queries for example?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snehal Trivedi</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/#comment-399430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snehal Trivedi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=22045#comment-399430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for such a great news.
As Microsoft discontinued one such command like DBCC PINTABLE, however it required manual analysis and there were prons and cons also. Great idea to include such a functionality to existing arsenal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for such a great news.<br />
As Microsoft discontinued one such command like DBCC PINTABLE, however it required manual analysis and there were prons and cons also. Great idea to include such a functionality to existing arsenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feodor</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/#comment-398969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feodor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=22045#comment-398969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And also, here is another question: will Hekaton be used in SQL Azure? 
I did some tests of the Azure performance, and it seemed in a critical state: about 1 second to establish a connection and optimization speed and storage speed which was competing with my laptop&#039;s performance. (Here is the test results: http://sqlconcept.com/2012/12/20/analysis-of-sql-azure-performance-tests/)
 I really hope Azure gets better, so we can use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also, here is another question: will Hekaton be used in SQL Azure?<br />
I did some tests of the Azure performance, and it seemed in a critical state: about 1 second to establish a connection and optimization speed and storage speed which was competing with my laptop&#8217;s performance. (Here is the test results: <a href="http://sqlconcept.com/2012/12/20/analysis-of-sql-azure-performance-tests/" rel="nofollow">http://sqlconcept.com/2012/12/20/analysis-of-sql-azure-performance-tests/</a>)<br />
 I really hope Azure gets better, so we can use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feodor Georgiev</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/#comment-398236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feodor Georgiev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=22045#comment-398236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. 
This seems to be &quot;a day late and a dollar short&quot;, as the expression goes. But still it is better to have it late than never. 
I wonder, though, if these features will be specific to a certain edition; in other words, is it going to cost extra for a well-performing SQL Server? (We know from past experiences that some editions perform better than others - take the Resource Governor for example.)

Can I be one of the testers for the Hekaton?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.<br />
This seems to be &#8220;a day late and a dollar short&#8221;, as the expression goes. But still it is better to have it late than never.<br />
I wonder, though, if these features will be specific to a certain edition; in other words, is it going to cost extra for a well-performing SQL Server? (We know from past experiences that some editions perform better than others &#8211; take the Resource Governor for example.)</p>
<p>Can I be one of the testers for the Hekaton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virendra Yaduvanshi</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/12/23/sql-server-what-is-hekaton-simple-words-explanation/#comment-397973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Virendra Yaduvanshi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=22045#comment-397973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice information dear!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice information dear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
