<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Table Variables and Transactions &#8211; SQL in Sixty Seconds #007 &#8211; Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/03/21/sql-server-table-variables-and-transactions-sql-in-sixty-seconds-007-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/03/21/sql-server-table-variables-and-transactions-sql-in-sixty-seconds-007-video/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #021 &#124; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/03/21/sql-server-table-variables-and-transactions-sql-in-sixty-seconds-007-video/#comment-442570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #021 &#124; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 01:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=17870#comment-442570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Table Variables and Transactions – SQL in Sixty Seconds #007 – Video Quite often I have seen people getting confused with certain behavior of the T-SQL. They expect SQL to behave a certain way and SQL Server behave differently. This kind of issue often creates confusion and frustration. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Table Variables and Transactions – SQL in Sixty Seconds #007 – Video Quite often I have seen people getting confused with certain behavior of the T-SQL. They expect SQL to behave a certain way and SQL Server behave differently. This kind of issue often creates confusion and frustration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yogesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/03/21/sql-server-table-variables-and-transactions-sql-in-sixty-seconds-007-video/#comment-266126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yogesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=17870#comment-266126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gr8! reference]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gr8! reference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kk</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/03/21/sql-server-table-variables-and-transactions-sql-in-sixty-seconds-007-video/#comment-265862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=17870#comment-265862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. I&#039;ve learnt this from you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I&#8217;ve learnt this from you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shantanu Gupta</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/03/21/sql-server-table-variables-and-transactions-sql-in-sixty-seconds-007-video/#comment-265536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shantanu Gupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=17870#comment-265536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Pinal: Thank you so much for putting some light on this. I noticed this behaviour just 2 week ago and trying to figure out why this is the case inspite of both the tables getting created in tempdb.tables
I also observed that any local variable declared on the same scenario works like local table variable. Please let me know WHY this is the case. Is it the case that Transactions are associated with connection and scope of Temp table is wrt connection while table variable is local to the scope ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pinal: Thank you so much for putting some light on this. I noticed this behaviour just 2 week ago and trying to figure out why this is the case inspite of both the tables getting created in tempdb.tables<br />
I also observed that any local variable declared on the same scenario works like local table variable. Please let me know WHY this is the case. Is it the case that Transactions are associated with connection and scope of Temp table is wrt connection while table variable is local to the scope ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
