<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Target Recovery Time of a Database &#8211; Advance Option in SQL Server 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Johnston</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-430394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Johnston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-430394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently moved to 2012 on a huge 64 processor machine with 250gb RAM.- super fast and we are experiencing the dreaded &quot;SQL Server has encountered NNNN occurrence(s) of I/O requests taking longer than 15 seconds to complete on file:...&quot;  I&#039;m reading that the new Indirect checkpoints are supposed to &quot;smooth out&quot; I/O spikes, but is it possible for them to have a negative effect on I/O?  Our recovery interval is still set to zero, so I am unclear if we even have Indirect checkpoints working.
 
Increasing the recovery time will have what kind of impact?  At this point its far more important to us to maximize throughput, than recovery time, but I suspect we may be having the 833 issues because of occasional I/O spikes (Occasional spurts of lots of updates being issued between checkpoints).  Would using Indirect checkpoints &quot;smooth out&quot; the I/O?.  Form what I&#039;m seeing, changing the recovery from zero to some other number would cause less checkpoints. and greater I/O spikes during the checkpoints. 

The SAN people are insisting it must be SQL server, because the dont see anything about the SAN or network having issues, but we believe its a SAN issue not being able to handle the spikes (possibly duirng checkpoints)  I dont particularly care what is to blame, I am simply looking for a way to stop the 833&#039;s - Would issuing more frequent, and therefore smaller checkpoints smooth out the I/O?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently moved to 2012 on a huge 64 processor machine with 250gb RAM.- super fast and we are experiencing the dreaded &#8220;SQL Server has encountered NNNN occurrence(s) of I/O requests taking longer than 15 seconds to complete on file:&#8230;&#8221;  I&#8217;m reading that the new Indirect checkpoints are supposed to &#8220;smooth out&#8221; I/O spikes, but is it possible for them to have a negative effect on I/O?  Our recovery interval is still set to zero, so I am unclear if we even have Indirect checkpoints working.</p>
<p>Increasing the recovery time will have what kind of impact?  At this point its far more important to us to maximize throughput, than recovery time, but I suspect we may be having the 833 issues because of occasional I/O spikes (Occasional spurts of lots of updates being issued between checkpoints).  Would using Indirect checkpoints &#8220;smooth out&#8221; the I/O?.  Form what I&#8217;m seeing, changing the recovery from zero to some other number would cause less checkpoints. and greater I/O spikes during the checkpoints. </p>
<p>The SAN people are insisting it must be SQL server, because the dont see anything about the SAN or network having issues, but we believe its a SAN issue not being able to handle the spikes (possibly duirng checkpoints)  I dont particularly care what is to blame, I am simply looking for a way to stop the 833&#8242;s &#8211; Would issuing more frequent, and therefore smaller checkpoints smooth out the I/O?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #009 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-400687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #009 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-400687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Target Recovery Time of a Database – Advance Option in SQL Server 2012 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Target Recovery Time of a Database – Advance Option in SQL Server 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; What is Piecemeal Restore &#8211; Quiz &#8211; Puzzle &#8211; 22 of 31 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-242416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; What is Piecemeal Restore &#8211; Quiz &#8211; Puzzle &#8211; 22 of 31 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-242416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in Full Recovery Model Effect of Compressed Backup Setting at Server Level on Database Backup Target Recovery Time of a Database – Advance Option in SQL Server 2012 A Quick Script for Point in Time Recovery – Back Up and Restore Copy Database from Instance to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Full Recovery Model Effect of Compressed Backup Setting at Server Level on Database Backup Target Recovery Time of a Database – Advance Option in SQL Server 2012 A Quick Script for Point in Time Recovery – Back Up and Restore Copy Database from Instance to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; CHECKPOINT Behavior and Database Recovery Models &#8211; Quiz &#8211; Puzzle &#8211; 16 of 31 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-238989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; CHECKPOINT Behavior and Database Recovery Models &#8211; Quiz &#8211; Puzzle &#8211; 16 of 31 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-238989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] SQL Server Interview Questions and Answers ISBN: 1466405643 Page#137 Target Recovery Time of a Database – Advance Option in SQL Server 2012 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SQL Server Interview Questions and Answers ISBN: 1466405643 Page#137 Target Recovery Time of a Database – Advance Option in SQL Server 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramdas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-226906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramdas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-226906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article on the checkpoint feature. Would be interested to know case studies/projects where this would be used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article on the checkpoint feature. Would be interested to know case studies/projects where this would be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nakul Vachhrajani</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-226655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakul Vachhrajani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-226655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to know about this. However, in the systems I work on, I don&#039;t quite have a use-case where I see myself setting the &quot;Target recovery time&quot; value to anything other than the default (i.e. 0).

I would be interested to know of any case study or a hypothetical scenario where this can be useful. Also, @Pinal: I am looking forward to reading about the results of your workload oriented tests.

Thank-you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know about this. However, in the systems I work on, I don&#8217;t quite have a use-case where I see myself setting the &#8220;Target recovery time&#8221; value to anything other than the default (i.e. 0).</p>
<p>I would be interested to know of any case study or a hypothetical scenario where this can be useful. Also, @Pinal: I am looking forward to reading about the results of your workload oriented tests.</p>
<p>Thank-you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinesh@Programming Online with Source Codes</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-226645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinesh@Programming Online with Source Codes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-226645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot @Balmukund Sir ! It may help me a lot..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot @Balmukund Sir ! It may help me a lot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balmukund</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-226573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balmukund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-226573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi Dinesh.,
You can download it from 
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=28145]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Dinesh.,<br />
You can download it from<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=28145" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=28145</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAAHI SINGH</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-226568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MAAHI SINGH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-226568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[exec(N&#039;update membermaster set isactive = &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; where msrno in (&#039; + @MemberList + &#039; ) &#039;)  HEY PINAL WHAT IS N HERE AFTER EXEC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exec(N&#8217;update membermaster set isactive = &#8221;A&#8221; where msrno in (&#8216; + @MemberList + &#8216; ) &#8216;)  HEY PINAL WHAT IS N HERE AFTER EXEC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinesh@Programming Online with Source Codes</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/12/27/sql-server-target-recovery-time-of-a-database-advance-option-in-sql-server-2012/#comment-226513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinesh@Programming Online with Source Codes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=16449#comment-226513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Pinal,.. I want to download SQL Server 2012. From where, can i get it? Plz...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Pinal,.. I want to download SQL Server 2012. From where, can i get it? Plz&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
