Comments on: SQL SERVER – 2012 – Executing Stored Procedure with Result Sets

By: SQL SERVER – Weekly Series – Memory Lane – #027 | SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority

Sat, 04 May 2013 01:31:45 +0000

[...] Executing Stored Procedure with Result Sets [...]

By: karthik

karthik — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:31:46 +0000

Its not flexible…have many Limitations

By: Thangamani

Thangamani — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:32:36 +0000

Hi Pinal,

Is this is supported in the sql server 2008 or this feature is avialiable in the sql server 2012 or late. Since when i run this query it throws an error.

By: Ankit Baria

Ankit Baria — Wed, 23 May 2012 15:24:51 +0000

Thanks a lot really helpful

By: Anitesh

Anitesh — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:24:28 +0000

Can we change column datatypes also, as column names?

By: EvilDr

EvilDr — Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:28:26 +0000

What happens if I want to use the result set in numerous different ways? For example when using a table variable, I get the results, then perform lots of different selects upon it.
Do we presume here that the PROC will execute again every time the result is referenced?

By: madhivanan

madhivanan — Mon, 02 May 2011 10:35:13 +0000

Refer point 2 which exactly does what you wanted
http://beyondrelational.com/blogs/madhivanan/archive/2007/11/24/select-columns-from-exec-procedure-name-is-this-possible.aspx

By: SQL SERVER – Performance Improvement with of Executing Stored Procedure with Result Sets in Denali Journey to SQLAuthority

Mon, 02 May 2011 01:32:03 +0000

[...] SERVER – Denali – Executing Stored Procedure with Result Sets. After reading this SQL Expert Ramdas asked following and very interesting question: This is a nice feature and i am sure would be used a [...]

By: Chintan Gandhi

Chintan Gandhi — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:16:22 +0000

What i’d really like to be able to do is get the result of the SP into a table without having to know before hand what are the number and type of columns going to be returned…

Something like
SELECT * INTO#tmp_my_result FROM EXEC dbo.My_Sp

By: SQL SERVER – Denali – Executing Stored Procedure with Result Sets Journey to SQLAuthority

Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:32:04 +0000

[...] Comments « SQL SERVER – Denali – Executing Stored Procedure with Result Sets [...]

By: pinaldave

pinaldave — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:03:38 +0000

great idea – I will have this out this week.

Sir, you gave me great idea!

By: Ramdas

Ramdas — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:52:00 +0000

This is a nice feature and i am sure would be used a lot. How is the performance of this as compared with using temp tables?

By: Vishal

Vishal — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:11:57 +0000

Nice Feature,

As Tejas Suggested more transformations will be nice…

There is a suggestion posted for this, hope to see this in future relases… :)

https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/635426/support-more-transformation-in-execute-with-result-sets-insert-exec-scenarios

Thanks,
Vishal

By: Virul Patel

Virul Patel — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:25:52 +0000

Its very good, As we really want some time this kind of requirement. Even if there is facility something good providing by microsoft, we can use that.

Thanks,
Virul
sqlvillage.wordpress.com

By: Azhar Iqbal

Azhar Iqbal — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:19:43 +0000

Nice Change. This will help for better performance.

By: Tejas Shah

Tejas Shah — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:37:20 +0000

Hi,

That is really good as many times we need to implement Stored Procedure rather than function to improve the performance.

I also want to know that, is it mandatory to have same number columns in result sets? Let say I just need to use two columns out of four columns.

Currently, When we did:

INSERT INTO Table
EXEC SP

This requires to have same nos of columns.

Thanks in advance.

Tejas
SQLYoga.com