<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD &#8211; Wait Type &#8211; Day 8 of 28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: prince rastogi</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-441022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prince rastogi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-441022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excessive CPU use may be the reason of Spinning and backoff..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excessive CPU use may be the reason of Spinning and backoff..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Newman</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-428748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Newman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-428748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of dropping the procedure or blowing away the cache, you could first try exec sp_recompile [storedProcedureName]; to recompile the execution plan. Sounds like a potential parameter sniffing matter on your proc or change in statistics for your table when a better plan could be reached. Overall, sounds like a bad execution plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of dropping the procedure or blowing away the cache, you could first try exec sp_recompile [storedProcedureName]; to recompile the execution plan. Sounds like a potential parameter sniffing matter on your proc or change in statistics for your table when a better plan could be reached. Overall, sounds like a bad execution plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lasri</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-426415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lasri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-426415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the same issue, and fixed by drop and create the sp
how this can be explained ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same issue, and fixed by drop and create the sp<br />
how this can be explained ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yassine, Lasri</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-426414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yassine, Lasri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-426414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the same situation and just fixed the issue by dropping and recreating the sp. what was behind ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same situation and just fixed the issue by dropping and recreating the sp. what was behind ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bojan Jekic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-425072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bojan Jekic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-425072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have situation:
SP work good from query, but not work from Excel (sos_scheduler_yield).

I FOUND RESOLUTION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--&gt; Just ReCreate this SP.

But, I can&#039;t explain this? Pinal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have situation:<br />
SP work good from query, but not work from Excel (sos_scheduler_yield).</p>
<p>I FOUND RESOLUTION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
&#8211;&gt; Just ReCreate this SP.</p>
<p>But, I can&#8217;t explain this? Pinal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #015 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-419695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #015 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 01:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-419695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD – Wait Type – Day 8 of 28 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD – Wait Type – Day 8 of 28 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firasatahmed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-414890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[firasatahmed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-414890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You basically cleared the cache from your system. Most likely there must be a bad execution plan which occasionally works good for few values out of the sproc, could also be issue of parameter sniffing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You basically cleared the cache from your system. Most likely there must be a bad execution plan which occasionally works good for few values out of the sproc, could also be issue of parameter sniffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhavisha Patel</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-276191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhavisha Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-276191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have same issue in production while running SSI sin for each loop which query million of rows. I am seeing this king of wait in &quot;last wait type&quot; session is showing Insert as running ststement but count in table is 0. As soon i as I kill session everthing start working as it should....Please suggest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have same issue in production while running SSI sin for each loop which query million of rows. I am seeing this king of wait in &#8220;last wait type&#8221; session is showing Insert as running ststement but count in table is 0. As soon i as I kill session everthing start working as it should&#8230;.Please suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stanleyjohns</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-148087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stanleyjohns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-148087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had this wait recently on one of our systems. Clients were reporting slow responses from the server. Doing a DBCC freeproccache and a DBCC freesystemcache fixed the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this wait recently on one of our systems. Clients were reporting slow responses from the server. Doing a DBCC freeproccache and a DBCC freesystemcache fixed the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigDave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-sos_scheduler_yield-wait-type-day-8-of-28/#comment-118339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigDave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11513#comment-118339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve often observed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD as &quot;last_wait_type&quot; instead of &quot;wait_type&quot;, where a unique session is consuming 100% of 1 cpu for hours (due to stale stats incurring nested loops between huge tables).
In this situation (no IO, lock, latch, network nor any other waits), SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD is the only event waited on, which means... no wait all all, am I right ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often observed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD as &#8220;last_wait_type&#8221; instead of &#8220;wait_type&#8221;, where a unique session is consuming 100% of 1 cpu for hours (due to stale stats incurring nested loops between huge tables).<br />
In this situation (no IO, lock, latch, network nor any other waits), SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD is the only event waited on, which means&#8230; no wait all all, am I right ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
