Comments on: SQL SERVER – Automation Process Good or Ugly http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-automation-process-good-or-ugly/ Personal Notes of Pinal Dave Fri, 17 May 2013 15:26:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: adan barrios cortes http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-automation-process-good-or-ugly/#comment-118435 Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:49:02 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11934#comment-118435 if error to excell some data mantnace in iso9000 and all those topics to fussion with enviroments of storage in private audittting red error to budget a life cicle.

]]> By: Sajid http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/08/sql-server-automation-process-good-or-ugly/#comment-117174 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 04:32:41 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11934#comment-117174 Automation dont have ugly side, only bad thing is overhead on the resources that some processes (agent/scheduler) keeps on running to trigger the task/jobs on its schedule…:).

I think, when a process is fixed and need to be run periodically… certainly Automation is best. It saves lots of manual efforts and time as well. But need to be implemented carefully, otherwise it could come up looking UGLY. (like the ones that you listed in UGLY section).

-Sajid

]]>