<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; CXPACKET &#8211; Parallelism &#8211; Advanced Solution &#8211; Wait Type &#8211; Day 7 of 28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/07/sql-server-cxpacket-parallelism-advanced-solution-wait-type-day-7-of-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/07/sql-server-cxpacket-parallelism-advanced-solution-wait-type-day-7-of-28/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #015 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/07/sql-server-cxpacket-parallelism-advanced-solution-wait-type-day-7-of-28/#comment-419694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #015 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 01:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11502#comment-419694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] CXPACKET – Parallelism – Advanced Solution – Wait Type – Day 7 of 28 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CXPACKET – Parallelism – Advanced Solution – Wait Type – Day 7 of 28 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arindam</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/07/sql-server-cxpacket-parallelism-advanced-solution-wait-type-day-7-of-28/#comment-371235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arindam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11502#comment-371235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,

I&#039;m also facing the same type issue as Anu. Could you please tell us the solutions ..

Arindam Das]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also facing the same type issue as Anu. Could you please tell us the solutions ..</p>
<p>Arindam Das</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anu</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/02/07/sql-server-cxpacket-parallelism-advanced-solution-wait-type-day-7-of-28/#comment-179128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11502#comment-179128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi,
we are encountering cxpacket issues in our production system
when we are supplying 160 gb file on 6 th day of every month and this file
won&#039;t be supplied every day.whenever we are supplying the file only during next day we got error.(cxpacket).
when the package was executing on first time after supplying the file
the issue cxpacket come and if the query was killed and we try to execute the same package using the below mentioned query scenario.the run was susccessful.plaese give solution on this as aeraly as possible.
the query that we used are used is delete statement calling select statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
we are encountering cxpacket issues in our production system<br />
when we are supplying 160 gb file on 6 th day of every month and this file<br />
won&#8217;t be supplied every day.whenever we are supplying the file only during next day we got error.(cxpacket).<br />
when the package was executing on first time after supplying the file<br />
the issue cxpacket come and if the query was killed and we try to execute the same package using the below mentioned query scenario.the run was susccessful.plaese give solution on this as aeraly as possible.<br />
the query that we used are used is delete statement calling select statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
