<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Reducing Page Contention on TempDB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/01/26/sql-server-reducing-page-contention-on-tempdb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/01/26/sql-server-reducing-page-contention-on-tempdb/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Database Worst Practices – New Town and New Job and New Disasters Journey to SQLAuthority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/01/26/sql-server-reducing-page-contention-on-tempdb/#comment-147575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Database Worst Practices – New Town and New Job and New Disasters Journey to SQLAuthority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11780#comment-147575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Reducing Page Contention on TempDB [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reducing Page Contention on TempDB [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madhivanan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/01/26/sql-server-reducing-page-contention-on-tempdb/#comment-114871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[madhivanan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11780#comment-114871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do it via SSMS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do it via SSMS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakri :-)</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/01/26/sql-server-reducing-page-contention-on-tempdb/#comment-114710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chakri :-)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11780#comment-114710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal

My question seems to be very silly but i dont know how it raised in my mind.
When we create the table how the sqlserver creates columns i mean in which sort order? suppose if i alter the table for adding a new column it will append at the end. but i want to add it some where in between of the existing columns. is it possible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal</p>
<p>My question seems to be very silly but i dont know how it raised in my mind.<br />
When we create the table how the sqlserver creates columns i mean in which sort order? suppose if i alter the table for adding a new column it will append at the end. but i want to add it some where in between of the existing columns. is it possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aasim abdullah</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2011/01/26/sql-server-reducing-page-contention-on-tempdb/#comment-114334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aasim abdullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11780#comment-114334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If database developers solved every third or fourth problem by using temporary tables, cursors or inefficient joins strategy, DBA must think seriously about TraceFlag 1118 or other solutions to resolve contentions problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If database developers solved every third or fourth problem by using temporary tables, cursors or inefficient joins strategy, DBA must think seriously about TraceFlag 1118 or other solutions to resolve contentions problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
