<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Index Created on View not Used Often &#8211; Limitation of the View 12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #008 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-397392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; Weekly Series &#8211; Memory Lane &#8211; #008 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-397392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12 This was a follow up of my earlier series of Limitation of the Views. Index are great when used properly &#8211; they are like a silver bullet. The same is true for Views as well. However, if both of them are together and not used properly that is the recipe of the disaster. Here is the earlier series of 11 limitations. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12 This was a follow up of my earlier series of Limitation of the Views. Index are great when used properly &#8211; they are like a silver bullet. The same is true for Views as well. However, if both of them are together and not used properly that is the recipe of the disaster. Here is the earlier series of 11 limitations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aravind</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-351677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aravind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-351677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sir i need to knw can wee create an index over view in sql server 2005 if its possible how plz let me know that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i need to knw can wee create an index over view in sql server 2005 if its possible how plz let me know that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER &#8211; Difference between Create Index &#8211; Drop Index &#8211; Rebuild Index &#8211; Quiz &#8211; Puzzle &#8211; 21 of 31 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-242017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER &#8211; Difference between Create Index &#8211; Drop Index &#8211; Rebuild Index &#8211; Quiz &#8211; Puzzle &#8211; 21 of 31 &#171; SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-242017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Size of Index Table for Each Index – Solution 2 Computed Columns – Index and Performance Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12 Video – Performance Improvement in Columnstore [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Size of Index Table for Each Index – Solution 2 Computed Columns – Index and Performance Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12 Video – Performance Improvement in Columnstore [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Observation of the View – Part 2 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-107415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Observation of the View – Part 2 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-107415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Observation of the View Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-107006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Observation of the View Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-107006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the query on the View will not use the View. You can read about this demonstration over here: SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12. I promised in that post that I would also write an article where I would demonstrate the condition [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the query on the View will not use the View. You can read about this demonstration over here: SQL SERVER – Index Created on View not Used Often – Limitation of the View 12. I promised in that post that I would also write an article where I would demonstrate the condition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aasim abdullah</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-106574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aasim abdullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-106574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It reminds me one of your early (nice) post http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/10/12/sql-server-indexed-view-always-use-index-on-index/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me one of your early (nice) post <a href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/10/12/sql-server-indexed-view-always-use-index-on-index/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/10/12/sql-server-indexed-view-always-use-index-on-index/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobi</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/18/sql-server-index-created-on-view-not-used-often-limitation-of-the-view-12/#comment-106554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11220#comment-106554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[omg it is crazy how you manage to twist the test scenario so that it proves your weird point. why would you use a materialized view in the first place? the query does not fit the index at all, too. it is just of no benefit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg it is crazy how you manage to twist the test scenario so that it proves your weird point. why would you use a materialized view in the first place? the query does not fit the index at all, too. it is just of no benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
