Comments on: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali Performance Comparison

By: aad

aad — Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:27:46 +0000

Is there a version SQL Server 2011?

By: SQL SERVER – Weekly Series – Memory Lane – #008 « SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority

Sat, 22 Dec 2012 01:32:01 +0000

[...] Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali Performance Comparison The real challenge of paging is all the unnecessary IO reads from the database. Network traffic was one of the reasons why paging has become a very expensive operation. I have seen many legacy applications where a complete result set is brought back to the application and paging has been done. As what you have read earlier, SQL Server 2011 offers a better alternative to an age-old solution. In this article I have compared the two tests on Performance and Paging [...]

By: Raghavendra

Raghavendra — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:14:47 +0000

In Test 1, Last page takes 1359 IO reads and in Test 2 B, same query reads 1020 IO pages . How this is possible?

By: sri

sri — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:39:06 +0000

Thanks for the reply, Does it stores the records, if so what will be life time? Does it clears when data changes are done or connection closed?

By: madhivanan

madhivanan — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:45:48 +0000

It is cached in the memory and SQL Server will reuse the cached plan

By: sri

sri — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:54:26 +0000

Why does sql query takes less time when executed second time? What will be the scope?

By: Johnny

Johnny — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:44:18 +0000

still doesn’t allow dynamic order by, so it’s still messy if we allow users to decide which column to sort by.

By: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server CE (Compact Edition) « Journey to SQLAuthority

Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:31:05 +0000

[...] SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali – A Better Alternative SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali Performance Comparison SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali – [...]

By: Darth Sonic

Darth Sonic — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:24:34 +0000

Even this is not correct. This one works out for me:

WHERE RowNumber >= (@PageNumber*@RowsPerPage)-@RowsPerPage+1 AND RowNumber <= (@PageNumber)*@RowsPerPage

By: Darth Sonic

Darth Sonic — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:21:58 +0000

The RowNumber filter is not correct. It msut look like this for the “old” method:

WHERE RowNumber >= (@PageNumber*@RowsPerPage)-@RowsPerPage+1 AND RowNumber <= (@PageNumber+1)*@RowsPerPage

By: smnbss

smnbss — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:56:56 +0000

one question:
what is the best way of returning the total number of records before the pagination both in SQL 2008 and 2011?

if I have a complex query, I do not want to duplicate the logic to get the recordset and the total count.
If I use CTE I can do one or the other…

By: Arun Gairola

Arun Gairola — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:17:09 +0000

Pinal Can i do server side Paging in SSMS 2008 ?

By: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server 2011 – Part2 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave

Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:31:20 +0000

[...] SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server 2011 Performance Comparison [...]

By: tobi

tobi — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:44:25 +0000

would like to see the execution plans in comparison (old vs. new).

By: Ramdas

Ramdas — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:02:01 +0000

Pinal,
Thanks for the detailed artile and the script. This would be of big help while developing applications that need paging.