Comments on: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali – A Better Alternative http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/ Personal Notes of Pinal Dave Sat, 25 May 2013 01:31:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: SQL SERVER – Weekly Series – Memory Lane – #009 « SQL Server Journey with SQL Authority http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-400683 Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:31:15 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-400683 [...] I wrote about SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali – A Better Alternative. A very popular article on that subject. I had used variables for “number of the rows” and [...]

]]> By: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server CE (Compact Edition) « Journey to SQLAuthority http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-175911 Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:30:58 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-175911 [...] SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali – A Better Alternative SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali Performance Comparison SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server Denali – Part2 [...]

]]> By: Anil Kumar Sahoo http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-131222 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:47:08 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-131222 Hi Pinal,

Its really good Article.

]]> By: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server 2011 – Part2 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-107864 Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:31:16 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-107864 [...] having blog is that SQL Community helps to keep it running with new ideas. Earlier I wrote about SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server 2011 – A Better Alternative. A very popular article on that subject. I had used variables for “number of the rows” [...]

]]> By: Sunil Kumar http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-107049 Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:24:23 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-107049 Sql is learnt and for read we r feeling comfertable .
And Sql is abckend language. we want store the data we can do to set a query and to set a include the the logic.

]]> By: John Goodwin http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-106448 Sat, 18 Dec 2010 01:18:55 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-106448 Hi Pinal,

Do you ever have any posts that go beyond the basic MSDN guide on a feature. And really, how relevant is this to now, when only Microsoft and God knows when Sql Server 2011 will be released.

I have you on my RSS feed and its time I remove your nuisance posts from my reading.

]]> By: pinaldave http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-106121 Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:40:05 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-106121 It is ANSI valid syntax.

]]> By: José F. Romaniello http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-106120 Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:30:27 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-106120 About the feature; it is an important feature, Sql 2005 has overcome this with an ugly syntax. Most of the relational databases does support this from long time ago.

Sincerely, this new syntax sucks less, but still sucks.
Are you seriously with this one???:

OFFSET @PageNumber*@RowsPerPage ROWS”
FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY

6 keywords!!!!!!! Postgresql and MySql just use TWO keywords for doing exactly OFFSET X LIMIT X. simpler than that?

]]> By: SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server 2011 Performance Comparison Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-106024 Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:32:00 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-106024 [...] Comments « SQL SERVER – Server Side Paging in SQL Server 2011 – A Better Alternative [...]

]]> By: Ramdas http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-106009 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:05:42 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-106009 Hi Pinal,
Nice feature, could you explain the syntax a little bit more
What does the OFFSET command do.

OFFSET @PageNumber*@RowsPerPage ROWS
FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY

]]> By: Luciano Evaristo Guerche (Gorše) http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-105977 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:19:04 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-105977 I was reading “Klaus Aschenbrenner – 2 of my favorite new T-SQL features in SQL Server Denali (SQL 11)” http://www.csharp.at/blog/PermaLink,guid,effb3653-33e1-4a6a-bbc5-9315f63dc938.aspx and noted he used:

OFFSET (@PageSize * (@CurrentPage – 1)) ROWS

Then I realized/recalled page 1 does not start at 11 but at 1 :-)

Cheers.

]]> By: Jamiet http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-105970 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:05:44 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-105970 There’s no such thing as SQL Server 2011. Not yet anyway.

]]> By: Luciano Evaristo Guerche (Gorše) http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-105957 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:03 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-105957 In your example, I am guessing pointer will be moved to record #50 (OFFSET) then FETCH NEXT (I am implying NEXT do not include current record #50) will get records from #51 to #60, so your example would be correctly stated, but I am not completely sure about it.

Cheers.

]]> By: Luciano Evaristo Guerche (Gorše) http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-105956 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:53:18 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-105956 Hi Pinal,

Should it not be the following?

FETCH NEXT @RowsPerPage ROWS ONLY

Why is it fixed at 10? Does FETCH NEXT not allow using a variable?

Another doubt which arose to me is:

Shouldn’t it be:

OFFSET (@PageNumber * @RowsPerPage) + 1 ROWS

instead of

OFFSET @PageNumber*@RowsPerPage ROWS

?

Thanks and regards,

]]> By: Zafar Iqbal http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-105862 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:08:49 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-105862 What is the difference with respect to the performance between different ways of paging i.e using CTE , using SubQuery and latest using offset

]]> By: prasad yangamuni http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/12/15/sql-server-server-side-paging-in-sql-server-2011-a-better-alternative/#comment-105717 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:16:08 +0000 http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=11179#comment-105717 Hello Pinal,
Awesome article, This was really nice feature…
this feature will reduce lot of developer burden…

]]>