<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQLAuthority News &#8211; Why SQL Server is better than any other RDBMS Applications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/</link>
	<description>SQL, SQL Server, MySQL, Big Data and NoSQL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohit Khare</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-278150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohit Khare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-278150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q:  Why SQL Server is better than any other RDBMS application?



A:  (1) Tight integration with Visual Studio. Made for each other.

(2)  Intelli-Sense enabled GUI to work with. Sorry, I mean to say they were the first to start Intelli-Sense. 

(3) Rich community. Microsoft is expert in marketing. Your head won&#039;t stuck when serious issue arises. You can easily find a trouble-shooter next door.

(4) Easy to scale from a desktop database to a server database. Many people use it on a single PC.

(5) No complexity and virtually doesn&#039;t require a dedicated DBA in most cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q:  Why SQL Server is better than any other RDBMS application?</p>
<p>A:  (1) Tight integration with Visual Studio. Made for each other.</p>
<p>(2)  Intelli-Sense enabled GUI to work with. Sorry, I mean to say they were the first to start Intelli-Sense. </p>
<p>(3) Rich community. Microsoft is expert in marketing. Your head won&#8217;t stuck when serious issue arises. You can easily find a trouble-shooter next door.</p>
<p>(4) Easy to scale from a desktop database to a server database. Many people use it on a single PC.</p>
<p>(5) No complexity and virtually doesn&#8217;t require a dedicated DBA in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shyam</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-268405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shyam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-268405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am given this question as assignment if you have the solution can you mail me. my mail-id ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am given this question as assignment if you have the solution can you mail me. my mail-id </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anu</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-122826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-122826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this part of the exercise you are required to write SQL queries. Your solutions will be graded based on its correctness, as well as on its simplicity.

1. 	You are given the following relation definitions which describe the world of Sports:
Sportsman (Sid, Sname, Sage, Scountry)
Coach (Cid, Cname, Cage, Ccountry)
Coaches (Cid, Sid, salary)

All id’s age and salaries are of type number, and the rest of the attributes are of type varchar2 (30). A sportsman may have 0 or more coaches, a coach may have 0 or more sportsmen. A sportsman cannot coach himself. Age and salaries are positive. All pairs of (Cid, Sid) must exist in Sportsman and Coach, respectively. 
Note:  Assume and take appropriate data according to the queries given. Insert at least 6 tuples for each relation in the database.

Formulate the following queries in SQL:

a)	Find the names of all sports man whose names begin with the letter ‘S’, ends with the  letter ‘e’, and the letter ‘m’ appears in their name.

b)	Find the names of sportsmen who are from India and over the age of 23, and have a coach (at least one).

c)	Find the names of all coaches who coach a sportsman from their own country and they are not the oldest coaches.

d)  Find the names of coaches from Italy who coach more than 2 sportsmen.

e)  Find the coaches who do not train a French sportsman.

f)  Find the coaches who train a sportsman who is not Indian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this part of the exercise you are required to write SQL queries. Your solutions will be graded based on its correctness, as well as on its simplicity.</p>
<p>1. 	You are given the following relation definitions which describe the world of Sports:<br />
Sportsman (Sid, Sname, Sage, Scountry)<br />
Coach (Cid, Cname, Cage, Ccountry)<br />
Coaches (Cid, Sid, salary)</p>
<p>All id’s age and salaries are of type number, and the rest of the attributes are of type varchar2 (30). A sportsman may have 0 or more coaches, a coach may have 0 or more sportsmen. A sportsman cannot coach himself. Age and salaries are positive. All pairs of (Cid, Sid) must exist in Sportsman and Coach, respectively.<br />
Note:  Assume and take appropriate data according to the queries given. Insert at least 6 tuples for each relation in the database.</p>
<p>Formulate the following queries in SQL:</p>
<p>a)	Find the names of all sports man whose names begin with the letter ‘S’, ends with the  letter ‘e’, and the letter ‘m’ appears in their name.</p>
<p>b)	Find the names of sportsmen who are from India and over the age of 23, and have a coach (at least one).</p>
<p>c)	Find the names of all coaches who coach a sportsman from their own country and they are not the oldest coaches.</p>
<p>d)  Find the names of coaches from Italy who coach more than 2 sportsmen.</p>
<p>e)  Find the coaches who do not train a French sportsman.</p>
<p>f)  Find the coaches who train a sportsman who is not Indian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQLAuthority News – A Monthly Round Up of SQLAuthority Blog Posts – August 2010 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-85712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQLAuthority News – A Monthly Round Up of SQLAuthority Blog Posts – August 2010 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-85712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] went well once people start reading the article. I had really good discussion also on the article SQLAuthority News – Why SQL Server is better than any other RDBMS Applications?. Obviously SQL Server is the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] went well once people start reading the article. I had really good discussion also on the article SQLAuthority News – Why SQL Server is better than any other RDBMS Applications?. Obviously SQL Server is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarik</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your blog more and more each time I read articles on it. It is full of really useful articles/advices. But this article may seem a bit weak..  I don&#039;t know if the subject is to blame (users of ms sql server tell why this tool is the best) or the winners&#039; answers tone (they sound a bit like kids&#039; essays: my father is the strongest, my mom is the cutest...  no objective evidence to most arguments).. it is by essence biased.  
I&#039;m looking forward to reading your great posts nonetheless !
Cheers.   

BTW I&#039;m a sql server user/fan myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your blog more and more each time I read articles on it. It is full of really useful articles/advices. But this article may seem a bit weak..  I don&#8217;t know if the subject is to blame (users of ms sql server tell why this tool is the best) or the winners&#8217; answers tone (they sound a bit like kids&#8217; essays: my father is the strongest, my mom is the cutest&#8230;  no objective evidence to most arguments).. it is by essence biased.<br />
I&#8217;m looking forward to reading your great posts nonetheless !<br />
Cheers.   </p>
<p>BTW I&#8217;m a sql server user/fan myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[commented edited and sent email, will post comment after receiving response]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[commented edited and sent email, will post comment after receiving response]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gergely Orosz</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gergely Orosz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is missing facts and thus can&#039;t be taken seriously. Take this sentence: &quot;Perfect match for all level of organizations… small firms to big enterprise to data store.&quot; Not a tiny bit related to MSSQL, it could be stated equally for all the other vendors. Same with most of the arguments.

Please take the time to gather some facts and create an objective list, this is just plain subjective reasoning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is missing facts and thus can&#8217;t be taken seriously. Take this sentence: &#8220;Perfect match for all level of organizations… small firms to big enterprise to data store.&#8221; Not a tiny bit related to MSSQL, it could be stated equally for all the other vendors. Same with most of the arguments.</p>
<p>Please take the time to gather some facts and create an objective list, this is just plain subjective reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ulon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hahaha, thanks for the fun. Now, I have go back to something serious. bye.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha, thanks for the fun. Now, I have go back to something serious. bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bozhidar Bozhanov</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bozhidar Bozhanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but this doesn&#039;t sound serious.

1. Easy integration with Microsoft Operating systems.

Hurray. Can we run in on Linux, if our entire infrastructure (application servers, search engine, messaging, etc..) are on Linux - no. How great?

2. East integration with world’s most common database: Spreadsheet, Microsoft excel in particular and power pivot has significantly enhanced its value.

Import a csv is a feature of every database, and the data from each spreadsheet can be expported to csv. 

5. Integrated Security (windows authentication): This definitely help streamline server access based on Active directory policies and groups.

See point 1.

9. SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS): As compare to other RDMS systems tools, SSMS is the best tool for a developer or a DBA.

Eh, what? I bet they(you) haven&#039;t tried Navicat. Or any other such tool for that matter.

Everything else, like enhanced optimizer, replication, disaster recovery, etc., etc. are available in all RDBMS. And, btw &quot;RDBMS application&quot; sounds a bit odd to my ears -- &quot;[..] system application&quot;.

Oh, I just want to mention something - LIMIT everywhere, TOP in MSSQL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but this doesn&#8217;t sound serious.</p>
<p>1. Easy integration with Microsoft Operating systems.</p>
<p>Hurray. Can we run in on Linux, if our entire infrastructure (application servers, search engine, messaging, etc..) are on Linux &#8211; no. How great?</p>
<p>2. East integration with world’s most common database: Spreadsheet, Microsoft excel in particular and power pivot has significantly enhanced its value.</p>
<p>Import a csv is a feature of every database, and the data from each spreadsheet can be expported to csv. </p>
<p>5. Integrated Security (windows authentication): This definitely help streamline server access based on Active directory policies and groups.</p>
<p>See point 1.</p>
<p>9. SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS): As compare to other RDMS systems tools, SSMS is the best tool for a developer or a DBA.</p>
<p>Eh, what? I bet they(you) haven&#8217;t tried Navicat. Or any other such tool for that matter.</p>
<p>Everything else, like enhanced optimizer, replication, disaster recovery, etc., etc. are available in all RDBMS. And, btw &#8220;RDBMS application&#8221; sounds a bit odd to my ears &#8212; &#8220;[..] system application&#8221;.</p>
<p>Oh, I just want to mention something &#8211; LIMIT everywhere, TOP in MSSQL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinaldave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pinaldave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you please explain a bit more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you please explain a bit more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remo</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like something from a Microsoft Marketing person. Things like: &quot;SSMS is the best&quot; don&#039;t sound very professional. I always preferred Allroundautomations PL/SQL Developers, its context menus are great, a nicely working debugger and a lot more.. That&#039;s a personal opinion!

User friendly interface: You might like it, but even I who work almost 100% on Windows still likes tools with configuration files. For a professional who works every day with the system, a text file can be a lot more efficient. I can easily copy the file before I make some changes. I can grep after a value, I can add a single line in my documentation and every admin will understand what I mean. If there&#039;s some shell like bash I can even add a single line you can copy&amp;paste to activate a certain feature. An old fashioned console can be very fast and easy to use, it depends on what you do and it depends on your background.

To me simplicity is if I can execute a simple command instead of having to click around a graphical user interface. But I get that someone doesn&#039;t like that approach. It depends!

Your statements about licensing is rather hard to understand. I actually never understood why there are people working at Microsoft called &quot;Senior License Evangelist&quot;...

SQL Server is definitely a great product but it&#039;s definitely not the best product for everything. A small database like SQLite does have a lot of advantages over SQL Server. And yes, I know there&#039;s SQL Server Express.

If you&#039;re comparing products don&#039;t just write &quot;It&#039;s better&quot;. Do an actual comparison and don&#039;t forget that people have different opinions!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like something from a Microsoft Marketing person. Things like: &#8220;SSMS is the best&#8221; don&#8217;t sound very professional. I always preferred Allroundautomations PL/SQL Developers, its context menus are great, a nicely working debugger and a lot more.. That&#8217;s a personal opinion!</p>
<p>User friendly interface: You might like it, but even I who work almost 100% on Windows still likes tools with configuration files. For a professional who works every day with the system, a text file can be a lot more efficient. I can easily copy the file before I make some changes. I can grep after a value, I can add a single line in my documentation and every admin will understand what I mean. If there&#8217;s some shell like bash I can even add a single line you can copy&amp;paste to activate a certain feature. An old fashioned console can be very fast and easy to use, it depends on what you do and it depends on your background.</p>
<p>To me simplicity is if I can execute a simple command instead of having to click around a graphical user interface. But I get that someone doesn&#8217;t like that approach. It depends!</p>
<p>Your statements about licensing is rather hard to understand. I actually never understood why there are people working at Microsoft called &#8220;Senior License Evangelist&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>SQL Server is definitely a great product but it&#8217;s definitely not the best product for everything. A small database like SQLite does have a lot of advantages over SQL Server. And yes, I know there&#8217;s SQL Server Express.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re comparing products don&#8217;t just write &#8220;It&#8217;s better&#8221;. Do an actual comparison and don&#8217;t forget that people have different opinions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Onim</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Onim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice Microsoft&#039;s marketing.
Unfortunately, as the majority of them - false.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Microsoft&#8217;s marketing.<br />
Unfortunately, as the majority of them &#8211; false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 08:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R.O.F.L.

Geeze kids today, seems you wouldn&#039;t recognize a decent rdbms and hosting solution if it hit you over the head, which in fact, if you knew how to use google and actually evaluate the alternatives, it actually does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.O.F.L.</p>
<p>Geeze kids today, seems you wouldn&#8217;t recognize a decent rdbms and hosting solution if it hit you over the head, which in fact, if you knew how to use google and actually evaluate the alternatives, it actually does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/14/sqlauthority-news-why-sql-server-is-better-than-any-other-rdbms-applications/#comment-84132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=9845#comment-84132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Licensing is simple?  I think this is complicated http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/pricing.aspx?pf=true

Licensing of Interbase, DB2, PostgreSQL, etc. is many times simpler.. and usually less expensive also.

As always, &quot;the best RDBMS&quot; depends on what you want to do with it.  Absolutely, SQL Server is the best ever if you are integrating with other MS products.

At my office, SQL Server is &quot;the&quot; tool without question.  On my hobby projects at home, I don&#039;t go anywhere near it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Licensing is simple?  I think this is complicated <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/pricing.aspx?pf=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/pricing.aspx?pf=true</a></p>
<p>Licensing of Interbase, DB2, PostgreSQL, etc. is many times simpler.. and usually less expensive also.</p>
<p>As always, &#8220;the best RDBMS&#8221; depends on what you want to do with it.  Absolutely, SQL Server is the best ever if you are integrating with other MS products.</p>
<p>At my office, SQL Server is &#8220;the&#8221; tool without question.  On my hobby projects at home, I don&#8217;t go anywhere near it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
