<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQLAuthority News &#8211; SQL SERVER 2008 R2 Pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/</link>
	<description>SQL, SQL Server, MySQL, Big Data and NoSQL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/#comment-63348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=8119#comment-63348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the real question is going to be the SQL transition paths for those that have Software Assurance. Under the current 2008 SQL licening for Enterprise, if you license the physical processors you get unlimited instances of the s/w. However, in the R2 Enterprise is limited to &quot;up to 25&quot; and DataCenter now holds the unlimited instances. 

So, inquiring minds *really* want to know for budget reasons - 

If a customer currently has SQL Server Enterprise w/ SA will they be transitioned to SQL Server 2008 R2 DataCenter or will they have to purchase the Step Up SKU?

Any documentation you can find on this would be helpful as well. 

Thanks, 
H]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the real question is going to be the SQL transition paths for those that have Software Assurance. Under the current 2008 SQL licening for Enterprise, if you license the physical processors you get unlimited instances of the s/w. However, in the R2 Enterprise is limited to &#8220;up to 25&#8243; and DataCenter now holds the unlimited instances. </p>
<p>So, inquiring minds *really* want to know for budget reasons &#8211; </p>
<p>If a customer currently has SQL Server Enterprise w/ SA will they be transitioned to SQL Server 2008 R2 DataCenter or will they have to purchase the Step Up SKU?</p>
<p>Any documentation you can find on this would be helpful as well. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonal</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/#comment-62535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=8119#comment-62535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ramdas ,

[Edited the comment. Reason withheld with moderator]

After using Bing I found following resource that explain Software Assurance.

http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/default.aspx

Sonal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramdas ,</p>
<p>[Edited the comment. Reason withheld with moderator]</p>
<p>After using Bing I found following resource that explain Software Assurance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/default.aspx</a></p>
<p>Sonal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramdas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/#comment-62416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramdas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=8119#comment-62416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SQL Server 2008 R2 has lot of good features coming down the pipe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SQL Server 2008 R2 has lot of good features coming down the pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramdas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/#comment-62415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramdas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=8119#comment-62415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sonal,

Software Assurance (SwA) is defined as “the level of confidence that software is free from vulnerabilities, either intentionally designed into the software or accidentally inserted at anytime during its lifecycle, and that the software functions in the intended manner.”
You can look this up in software engineering books/resources on google.
Ramdas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sonal,</p>
<p>Software Assurance (SwA) is defined as “the level of confidence that software is free from vulnerabilities, either intentionally designed into the software or accidentally inserted at anytime during its lifecycle, and that the software functions in the intended manner.”<br />
You can look this up in software engineering books/resources on google.<br />
Ramdas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonal</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/#comment-62406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=8119#comment-62406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir, 

What is Software Assurance?

Thanks

Sonal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, </p>
<p>What is Software Assurance?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Sonal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/03/08/sql-server-2008-r2-pricing/#comment-62355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=8119#comment-62355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per physical processor or per processor core?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per physical processor or per processor core?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
