<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Index Seek vs. Index Scan &#8211; Diffefence and Usage &#8211; A Simple Note</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javed Inamdar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-166223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Javed Inamdar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-166223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,
Its really nice article about difference between Index seek and scan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,<br />
Its really nice article about difference between Index seek and scan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-163319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-163319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice query.

With an extra field sic.key_ordinal and order by clause more readible, because the column fields are then in the exact order of the index:

SELECT  OBJECT_NAME(sis.OBJECT_ID) TableName, si.name AS IndexName, sic.key_ordinal, sc.Name AS ColumnName,
sic.Index_ID, sis.user_seeks, sis.user_scans, sis.user_lookups, sis.user_updates, sis.last_user_seek
FROM sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats sis
INNER JOIN sys.indexes si ON sis.OBJECT_ID = si.OBJECT_ID AND sis.Index_ID = si.Index_ID
INNER JOIN sys.index_columns sic ON sis.OBJECT_ID = sic.OBJECT_ID AND sic.Index_ID = si.Index_ID
INNER JOIN sys.columns sc ON sis.OBJECT_ID = sc.OBJECT_ID AND sic.Column_ID = sc.Column_ID
WHERE sis.Database_ID = DB_ID(&#039;prdomgcod&#039;) AND sis.OBJECT_ID in 
( OBJECT_ID(&#039;oas_docline&#039;), OBJECT_ID(&#039;oas_balance&#039;))
order by 
OBJECT_NAME(sis.OBJECT_ID), si.name, sic.key_ordinal, sc.Name,
sic.Index_ID, sis.user_seeks, sis.user_scans, sis.user_lookups, sis.user_updates, sis.last_user_seek
GO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice query.</p>
<p>With an extra field sic.key_ordinal and order by clause more readible, because the column fields are then in the exact order of the index:</p>
<p>SELECT  OBJECT_NAME(sis.OBJECT_ID) TableName, si.name AS IndexName, sic.key_ordinal, sc.Name AS ColumnName,<br />
sic.Index_ID, sis.user_seeks, sis.user_scans, sis.user_lookups, sis.user_updates, sis.last_user_seek<br />
FROM sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats sis<br />
INNER JOIN sys.indexes si ON sis.OBJECT_ID = si.OBJECT_ID AND sis.Index_ID = si.Index_ID<br />
INNER JOIN sys.index_columns sic ON sis.OBJECT_ID = sic.OBJECT_ID AND sic.Index_ID = si.Index_ID<br />
INNER JOIN sys.columns sc ON sis.OBJECT_ID = sc.OBJECT_ID AND sic.Column_ID = sc.Column_ID<br />
WHERE sis.Database_ID = DB_ID(&#8216;prdomgcod&#8217;) AND sis.OBJECT_ID in<br />
( OBJECT_ID(&#8216;oas_docline&#8217;), OBJECT_ID(&#8216;oas_balance&#8217;))<br />
order by<br />
OBJECT_NAME(sis.OBJECT_ID), si.name, sic.key_ordinal, sc.Name,<br />
sic.Index_ID, sis.user_seeks, sis.user_scans, sis.user_lookups, sis.user_updates, sis.last_user_seek<br />
GO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Interview Questions and Answers – Frequently Asked Questions – Day 13 of 31 Journey to SQLAuthority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-147828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Interview Questions and Answers – Frequently Asked Questions – Day 13 of 31 Journey to SQLAuthority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-147828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] An index seek, on the other hand, means that the Query Optimizer relies entirely on the index leaf data to locate rows satisfying the query condition. An index seek will be most beneficial in cases where a small percentage of rows will be returned. An index seek will only affect the rows that satisfy a query condition and the pages that contain these qualifying rows; in terms of performance, this is highly beneficial when a table has a very large number of rows. (Read more here) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An index seek, on the other hand, means that the Query Optimizer relies entirely on the index leaf data to locate rows satisfying the query condition. An index seek will be most beneficial in cases where a small percentage of rows will be returned. An index seek will only affect the rows that satisfy a query condition and the pages that contain these qualifying rows; in terms of performance, this is highly beneficial when a table has a very large number of rows. (Read more here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neraj Mishra</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-140278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neraj Mishra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-140278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please write an article about the jobs created under Transaction Replication with their functions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please write an article about the jobs created under Transaction Replication with their functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neraj Mishra</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-140276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neraj Mishra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-140276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for such a nice article.
It is concise and clear. Keep us updated in this way....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for such a nice article.<br />
It is concise and clear. Keep us updated in this way&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @nkit</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-80530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@nkit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-80530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,

Please write an article about the Selectivity, describing the situations where we shall create index in a column.

Also it will be great to have an article about the Fill Factor and its practical usage.

Thanks again for the valuable articles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>Please write an article about the Selectivity, describing the situations where we shall create index in a column.</p>
<p>Also it will be great to have an article about the Fill Factor and its practical usage.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the valuable articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-80480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Han]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-80480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,

Very gud article.

Could you please tell me what is the cons of using index ?
Thanks.

Han.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>Very gud article.</p>
<p>Could you please tell me what is the cons of using index ?<br />
Thanks.</p>
<p>Han.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajiv Singh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajiv Singh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal &amp; All,

Really very good explanation of index scan &amp; index seek. And by your article every one will familier with how can make faster seeking objects by index. And also you have cleared in your article for seeking the objects when it will fetching by leaf level and when it will fetching by table.

Also I have a question? Thats the general question off all interviewer..

If  Yesterday on the Server T-SQL statement was running fine but today it&#039;s take too much time. What are the reason?  

Thanks &amp; Regards,
Rajiv Singh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal &amp; All,</p>
<p>Really very good explanation of index scan &amp; index seek. And by your article every one will familier with how can make faster seeking objects by index. And also you have cleared in your article for seeking the objects when it will fetching by leaf level and when it will fetching by table.</p>
<p>Also I have a question? Thats the general question off all interviewer..</p>
<p>If  Yesterday on the Server T-SQL statement was running fine but today it&#8217;s take too much time. What are the reason?  </p>
<p>Thanks &amp; Regards,<br />
Rajiv Singh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.J.</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pinal, thanks for the article. One of the problems I had was following the logic. I&#039;m not sure it simplifies any more than BOL and other white papers on MS website that show scans and seeks at work. Furthermore you may have use used &quot;table&quot; and &quot;index&quot; interchangeably in one or more places. In any case, MS tweaks the cost algorithms for each server version. That&#039;s why we have to use the profiler and plan guides as tools to make the final choices for a specific application.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinal, thanks for the article. One of the problems I had was following the logic. I&#8217;m not sure it simplifies any more than BOL and other white papers on MS website that show scans and seeks at work. Furthermore you may have use used &#8220;table&#8221; and &#8220;index&#8221; interchangeably in one or more places. In any case, MS tweaks the cost algorithms for each server version. That&#8217;s why we have to use the profiler and plan guides as tools to make the final choices for a specific application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paresh Prajapati</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paresh Prajapati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have created script to find selectivity of each columns for every tables. In those some tables with less than 100 rows but selectivity of column is more than 50%.

So, is those column are eligible for index?
Or, can you tell, how much minimum rows require for eligibility  for creating index?


Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have created script to find selectivity of each columns for every tables. In those some tables with less than 100 rows but selectivity of column is more than 50%.</p>
<p>So, is those column are eligible for index?<br />
Or, can you tell, how much minimum rows require for eligibility  for creating index?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paresh Prajapati</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paresh Prajapati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And one thing also ,

select name , city from tables where id = 2
select * from tables where id = 2

Two indexes are created on table as following :

create index IC_Col1 on table(id) include (name, city)
create index IC_Col2 on table(id) 

1. which of above index is used for 
select name , city from tables where id = 2 

2. create index IC_Col2 on table(id)  can be used for both query
select name , city from tables where id = 2
select * from tables where id = 2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one thing also ,</p>
<p>select name , city from tables where id = 2<br />
select * from tables where id = 2</p>
<p>Two indexes are created on table as following :</p>
<p>create index IC_Col1 on table(id) include (name, city)<br />
create index IC_Col2 on table(id) </p>
<p>1. which of above index is used for<br />
select name , city from tables where id = 2 </p>
<p>2. create index IC_Col2 on table(id)  can be used for both query<br />
select name , city from tables where id = 2<br />
select * from tables where id = 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paresh Prajapati</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paresh Prajapati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ramdas,

So Selectivity ratio is more or around 80-90 percentage is the best option to create for index, Right?


Thanks all for you help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ramdas,</p>
<p>So Selectivity ratio is more or around 80-90 percentage is the best option to create for index, Right?</p>
<p>Thanks all for you help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire M</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good one!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay Kant</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjay Kant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave you are greatest!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave you are greatest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moy</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great description. It&#039;s exactly what I was looking for. 
It clarified me many things about indexes and execution plans explanation.

Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great description. It&#8217;s exactly what I was looking for.<br />
It clarified me many things about indexes and execution plans explanation.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Often an index needs to be very selective before it will be used, not 50% as you state but often 10% or lower.

Thanks
Ian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Often an index needs to be very selective before it will be used, not 50% as you state but often 10% or lower.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramdas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramdas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark,
Hope this article will clear it up. Pinal hope you don&#039;t mind me answering the question:

An index scan is a complete scan of all the pages in a non-clustered index.
A clustered index scan is a complete scan of all pages in a clustered index (ie, the table itself)
Neither scan uses the b-tree structure of the index, but just reads the leaf pages in order, using each page&#039;s reference to the next in the chain.

An index seek is a seek through the b-tree structure of a non-clustered index, from the root down to the leaf.
A clustered index seek is a seek through the b-tree structure of a clustered index, from the root down to the leaf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Hope this article will clear it up. Pinal hope you don&#8217;t mind me answering the question:</p>
<p>An index scan is a complete scan of all the pages in a non-clustered index.<br />
A clustered index scan is a complete scan of all pages in a clustered index (ie, the table itself)<br />
Neither scan uses the b-tree structure of the index, but just reads the leaf pages in order, using each page&#8217;s reference to the next in the chain.</p>
<p>An index seek is a seek through the b-tree structure of a non-clustered index, from the root down to the leaf.<br />
A clustered index seek is a seek through the b-tree structure of a clustered index, from the root down to the leaf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramdas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramdas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Paresh,
Some tips on Selectivity:

Example with good Selectivity 

A table having 100&#039;000 records and one of its indexed column has 88000 distinct values, then the selectivity of this index is 88&#039;000 / 10&#039;0000 = 0.88. 

The selectivity of an index is the percentage of rows in a table having the same value for the indexed column. An index&#039;s selectivity is good if few rows have the same value. 

Example with bad Selectivity 

lf an index on a table of 100&#039;000 records had only 500 distinct values, then the index&#039;s selectivity is 500 / 100&#039;000 = 0.005 and in this case a query which uses the limitation of such an index will retum 100&#039;000 / 500 = 200 records for each distinct value. It is evident that a full table scan is more efficient as using such an index where much more I/O is needed to scan repeatedly the index and the table. 

select count (distinct job) &quot;Distinct Values&quot; from emp;

Distinct Values
---------------
              5 

select count(*) &quot;Total Number Rows&quot; from emp;

Total Number Rows
-----------------
               14

Selectivity = Distinct Values / Total Number Rows
            = 5 / 14
            = 0.35]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paresh,<br />
Some tips on Selectivity:</p>
<p>Example with good Selectivity </p>
<p>A table having 100&#8217;000 records and one of its indexed column has 88000 distinct values, then the selectivity of this index is 88&#8217;000 / 10&#8217;0000 = 0.88. </p>
<p>The selectivity of an index is the percentage of rows in a table having the same value for the indexed column. An index&#8217;s selectivity is good if few rows have the same value. </p>
<p>Example with bad Selectivity </p>
<p>lf an index on a table of 100&#8217;000 records had only 500 distinct values, then the index&#8217;s selectivity is 500 / 100&#8217;000 = 0.005 and in this case a query which uses the limitation of such an index will retum 100&#8217;000 / 500 = 200 records for each distinct value. It is evident that a full table scan is more efficient as using such an index where much more I/O is needed to scan repeatedly the index and the table. </p>
<p>select count (distinct job) &#8220;Distinct Values&#8221; from emp;</p>
<p>Distinct Values<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
              5 </p>
<p>select count(*) &#8220;Total Number Rows&#8221; from emp;</p>
<p>Total Number Rows<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
               14</p>
<p>Selectivity = Distinct Values / Total Number Rows<br />
            = 5 / 14<br />
            = 0.35</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,

This post is a dangerous mix of poorly worded sentences and incorrect facts.

The fact that you are with Solid Quality Learning and an MVP is astonishing and is a testament to the quality of those organizations.

I feel sorry for the people that look to you for information and guidance.

Best of luck, Jason]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>This post is a dangerous mix of poorly worded sentences and incorrect facts.</p>
<p>The fact that you are with Solid Quality Learning and an MVP is astonishing and is a testament to the quality of those organizations.</p>
<p>I feel sorry for the people that look to you for information and guidance.</p>
<p>Best of luck, Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paresh Prajapati</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paresh Prajapati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How we can find the selectivity of column to create index?

Can you give me description?

How much rows (minimum  require for selectivity to create index?

Suppose one table have 200 rows, in this 175 rows are same ans 25 are distinct ? then will it be fine to create an index on that column?

or Can you give me exact scenario when column is liable for selective for index?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How we can find the selectivity of column to create index?</p>
<p>Can you give me description?</p>
<p>How much rows (minimum  require for selectivity to create index?</p>
<p>Suppose one table have 200 rows, in this 175 rows are same ans 25 are distinct ? then will it be fine to create an index on that column?</p>
<p>or Can you give me exact scenario when column is liable for selective for index?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question - do you mean:

An index scan means that SQL Server reads all rows in a table, and then returns only those rows that satisfy the search criteria.

or 

An index scan means that SQL Server reads all rows in a INDEX, and then returns only those rows that satisfy the search criteria.

?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question &#8211; do you mean:</p>
<p>An index scan means that SQL Server reads all rows in a table, and then returns only those rows that satisfy the search criteria.</p>
<p>or </p>
<p>An index scan means that SQL Server reads all rows in a INDEX, and then returns only those rows that satisfy the search criteria.</p>
<p>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As always a pleasure to read. 

Not to much information to over load first thing on a Monday but just enough to get you started!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always a pleasure to read. </p>
<p>Not to much information to over load first thing on a Monday but just enough to get you started!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuldip</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/08/24/sql-server-index-seek-vs-index-scan-diffefence-and-usage-a-simple-note/#comment-55150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuldip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=6648#comment-55150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really nice explanation of
Indexing and very useful for developers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice explanation of<br />
Indexing and very useful for developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

