<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Maximum Number of Index per Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: madhivanan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-178808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[madhivanan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-178808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the total indexes are 250 (including 1 clustered index) for 2005 and 1000 (including 1 clustered index) from version &gt;2005. So they are 250 and 1000 in total]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the total indexes are 250 (including 1 clustered index) for 2005 and 1000 (including 1 clustered index) from version &gt;2005. So they are 250 and 1000 in total</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-178444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-178444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why we have 249 non clustered index in sql server 2005? why not 240 or 300? and the same question for sql server 2008, why 999 ? Why not 800 or 1000?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why we have 249 non clustered index in sql server 2005? why not 240 or 300? and the same question for sql server 2008, why 999 ? Why not 800 or 1000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas Kadiyala</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-178348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srinivas Kadiyala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-178348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Geake</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-148489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Geake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-148489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As ever Pinal, you&#039;re so helpful!

Thanks a lot, Josh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ever Pinal, you&#8217;re so helpful!</p>
<p>Thanks a lot, Josh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Interview Questions and Answers – Frequently Asked Questions – Day 14 of 31 Journey to SQLAuthority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-148132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Interview Questions and Answers – Frequently Asked Questions – Day 14 of 31 Journey to SQLAuthority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-148132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 1 Clustered Index + 999 Nonclustered Index = 1000 Index. (Read more here) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 Clustered Index + 999 Nonclustered Index = 1000 Index. (Read more here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Database Worst Practices – New Town and New Job and New Disasters Journey to SQLAuthority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-147558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Database Worst Practices – New Town and New Job and New Disasters Journey to SQLAuthority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-147558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As a fact, we all know that a set of data can be only stored in only one order; that is why only one clustered index is possible.(Read more here) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a fact, we all know that a set of data can be only stored in only one order; that is why only one clustered index is possible.(Read more here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gennadiy Chornenkyy</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-111356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gennadiy Chornenkyy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-111356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like yes - if you try to create index on table with max number of statistics you&#039;ll get en error message]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like yes &#8211; if you try to create index on table with max number of statistics you&#8217;ll get en error message</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yogesh Goswami</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-76728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yogesh Goswami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-76728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well we can have a unique index. You just need to use Unique key word in Create Index statement.
/*Sample script*/
Use tempdb

Create table test1 (col1 int, col2 int)
Create unique index idx_uni1 on test1(col1)

So in short, an index could be clustered and non-clustered as well as unique and non-unique(total 4 variations). A unique index will not allow duplicate entry in the table based on the index key columns.
By default any index is non-cluster and non-unique unless specified otherwise in create statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we can have a unique index. You just need to use Unique key word in Create Index statement.<br />
/*Sample script*/<br />
Use tempdb</p>
<p>Create table test1 (col1 int, col2 int)<br />
Create unique index idx_uni1 on test1(col1)</p>
<p>So in short, an index could be clustered and non-clustered as well as unique and non-unique(total 4 variations). A unique index will not allow duplicate entry in the table based on the index key columns.<br />
By default any index is non-cluster and non-unique unless specified otherwise in create statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hennie</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-64687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hennie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-64687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two questions:

* What’s the number of indexes in SQL Server 2000 ?
* Do statistics occupy ’slots’ of this number. In other words clusterd index + non clustered + statistcs = 250 (SQL 2000/SQL 2005?)

thnx!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>* What’s the number of indexes in SQL Server 2000 ?<br />
* Do statistics occupy ’slots’ of this number. In other words clusterd index + non clustered + statistcs = 250 (SQL 2000/SQL 2005?)</p>
<p>thnx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hennie</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-64686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hennie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-64686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two questions:

* What&#039;s the number of indexes in SQL Server ?
* Do statistics occupy &#039;slots&#039; of this number. In other words clusterd index + non clustered + statistcs = 250 (SQL 2000/SQL 2005?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>* What&#8217;s the number of indexes in SQL Server ?<br />
* Do statistics occupy &#8216;slots&#8217; of this number. In other words clusterd index + non clustered + statistcs = 250 (SQL 2000/SQL 2005?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-63873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imran Mohammed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-63873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cluster Index Physically Stores data, or arranges data in one order (depends on which column(s) you have defined Clustered index and in which order. 

As a fact we all know that set of data can be only stored in only one order, that is why only one clustered index is possible.

You can create a view on top of table and then you can created Clustered index on that view.

Hope this helps.
~ IM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cluster Index Physically Stores data, or arranges data in one order (depends on which column(s) you have defined Clustered index and in which order. </p>
<p>As a fact we all know that set of data can be only stored in only one order, that is why only one clustered index is possible.</p>
<p>You can create a view on top of table and then you can created Clustered index on that view.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.<br />
~ IM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aniket Bhoyar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-63836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aniket Bhoyar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-63836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why can there be only 1 clustered index and not more than 1?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can there be only 1 clustered index and not more than 1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish Sharma</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-61061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harish Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-61061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good information. Thanks Pinal for sharing. Keep posting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good information. Thanks Pinal for sharing. Keep posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin Sharma</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-60537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitin Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-60537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very Informative..!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Informative..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kailash Dhanke</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-59980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kailash Dhanke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-59980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In SQL 2005

1 Cluster Index
249 Non Cluster Index

Total 250
-----------------------------------
In SQL 2008

1 Cluster Index
999 Non Cluster Index

Total
1000]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In SQL 2005</p>
<p>1 Cluster Index<br />
249 Non Cluster Index</p>
<p>Total 250<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
In SQL 2008</p>
<p>1 Cluster Index<br />
999 Non Cluster Index</p>
<p>Total<br />
1000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalyan Kumar Navana</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-56163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalyan Kumar Navana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-56163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are 2 types of indexes
1. Clustered Indexes
2. Non-clustered Indexes

There can be only one Clustered index in a table
and there can be 249 non-clustered indexes on a table
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 2 types of indexes<br />
1. Clustered Indexes<br />
2. Non-clustered Indexes</p>
<p>There can be only one Clustered index in a table<br />
and there can be 249 non-clustered indexes on a table</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-55965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imran Mohammed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-55965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Darshan,

There are no unique indexes in any version of SQL Server.

There are basically two types of indexes.
Clustered Indexes and Non-Clustered Indexes. 

In SQL Server 2005 :
you can have 
1 Clustered Index on a table and 
249 Non Clustered Indexes. 

Reference: Books Online 

Follow this link :
http://www.sql-server-helper.com/sql-server-2005/maximum-capacity-specifications.aspx

But, When ever you create a unique constraint on a column in a table, it automatically creates a non-clustered indexes. 

A unique Key constraint cannot be created with out an index, either the index could be Clustered or Non-Clustered.

So your question could be, How many unique constraints you can have on a table or how many Non-Clustered indexes you can have on a table. 

Answer is 249.  (Given, no other Non-Clustered index is created Separately)

~ IM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darshan,</p>
<p>There are no unique indexes in any version of SQL Server.</p>
<p>There are basically two types of indexes.<br />
Clustered Indexes and Non-Clustered Indexes. </p>
<p>In SQL Server 2005 :<br />
you can have<br />
1 Clustered Index on a table and<br />
249 Non Clustered Indexes. </p>
<p>Reference: Books Online </p>
<p>Follow this link :<br />
<a href="http://www.sql-server-helper.com/sql-server-2005/maximum-capacity-specifications.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.sql-server-helper.com/sql-server-2005/maximum-capacity-specifications.aspx</a></p>
<p>But, When ever you create a unique constraint on a column in a table, it automatically creates a non-clustered indexes. </p>
<p>A unique Key constraint cannot be created with out an index, either the index could be Clustered or Non-Clustered.</p>
<p>So your question could be, How many unique constraints you can have on a table or how many Non-Clustered indexes you can have on a table. </p>
<p>Answer is 249.  (Given, no other Non-Clustered index is created Separately)</p>
<p>~ IM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darshan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-55958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darshan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-55958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you tell me what&#039;s the maximum number of unique indexes in a table in sql server 2005 ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me what&#8217;s the maximum number of unique indexes in a table in sql server 2005 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Sonic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-54727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darth Sonic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-54727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Vijay: You are using SQL Server 2005, right? Read the post above or: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432(SQL.90).aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vijay: You are using SQL Server 2005, right? Read the post above or: <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432(SQL.90).aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432(SQL.90).aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-54718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-54718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Friends, 

Can any one tell me why we cannot create more than 249 Non-Clustered Indexes??

Thanks in advance,
Vijay Vasudevan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Friends, </p>
<p>Can any one tell me why we cannot create more than 249 Non-Clustered Indexes??</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
Vijay Vasudevan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinaldave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-53323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pinaldave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-53323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Imran and everybody.

Error has been fixed.

Kind Regards,
Pinal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Imran and everybody.</p>
<p>Error has been fixed.</p>
<p>Kind Regards,<br />
Pinal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Sonic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-53319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darth Sonic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-53319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little fault in your addition:
1 Clustered Index + 999 Nonclustered Index = 250 Index

Must be 1000 Index ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little fault in your addition:<br />
1 Clustered Index + 999 Nonclustered Index = 250 Index</p>
<p>Must be 1000 Index ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-53317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-53317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your total for SQL2008 isn&#039;t right either (1+999 = 1000).

Of course the likelihood is that any table that hits the maximum limits is part of a bad design.  Can anyone think of any scenario where even 250 nonclustered indexes might be necessary?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your total for SQL2008 isn&#8217;t right either (1+999 = 1000).</p>
<p>Of course the likelihood is that any table that hits the maximum limits is part of a bad design.  Can anyone think of any scenario where even 250 nonclustered indexes might be necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-53316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-53316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Imran is right. The link for SQL Server 2005 is referred to SQL Server 2000. 

Also I am little confused for SQL Server 2008 as it shows 
1 Clustered Index + 999 Nonclustered Index = 250 Index

Is it not 1000 Index?

Thanks,
DV]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Imran is right. The link for SQL Server 2005 is referred to SQL Server 2000. </p>
<p>Also I am little confused for SQL Server 2008 as it shows<br />
1 Clustered Index + 999 Nonclustered Index = 250 Index</p>
<p>Is it not 1000 Index?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
DV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artiom</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/29/sql-server-maximum-number-of-index-per-table/#comment-53315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artiom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5733#comment-53315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose you meant 100 indexes for SQL 2008 :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose you meant 100 indexes for SQL 2008 :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

