<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; 2008 &#8211; SSMS Feature &#8211; Multi-server Queries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER – Interview Questions and Answers – Frequently Asked Questions – Day 8 of 31 Journey to SQLAuthority</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/#comment-146776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SQL SERVER – Interview Questions and Answers – Frequently Asked Questions – Day 8 of 31 Journey to SQLAuthority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5352#comment-146776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Read more here) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Read more here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nakul Vachhrajani</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/#comment-115251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakul Vachhrajani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5352#comment-115251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, Pinal!

As you might know, I am writing a series on the Underappreciated features of Microsoft SQL Server. The series is actually inspired from Andy Warren&#039;s editorial of the same name in SQL Server Central.

One of the features that came up was the multi-server queries feature. I have thus referred your post in my article at: http://beyondrelational.com/blogs/nakul/archive/2011/02/04/multi-server-queries-underappreciated-features-of-microsoft-sql-server.aspx.

Do let me know your thoughts on the same.

Thank-you, and have a great day!

Thanks &amp; Regards,

Nakul Vachhrajani]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Pinal!</p>
<p>As you might know, I am writing a series on the Underappreciated features of Microsoft SQL Server. The series is actually inspired from Andy Warren&#8217;s editorial of the same name in SQL Server Central.</p>
<p>One of the features that came up was the multi-server queries feature. I have thus referred your post in my article at: <a href="http://beyondrelational.com/blogs/nakul/archive/2011/02/04/multi-server-queries-underappreciated-features-of-microsoft-sql-server.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://beyondrelational.com/blogs/nakul/archive/2011/02/04/multi-server-queries-underappreciated-features-of-microsoft-sql-server.aspx</a>.</p>
<p>Do let me know your thoughts on the same.</p>
<p>Thank-you, and have a great day!</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; Regards,</p>
<p>Nakul Vachhrajani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naresh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/#comment-101552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[naresh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5352#comment-101552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what if i want to add 100′s of servers at a time which are with same sa password.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if i want to add 100′s of servers at a time which are with same sa password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidG</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/#comment-59343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DavidG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5352#comment-59343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Came across this capability in SQL2k8 but was hoping it could replace the Linked Servers for doing multi-database queries. 

Unfortunately this appears to be for multi-server admin scripted tasks. Where the databases and structures are identical on each of the Registered Servers in the Group. Such as with the sys.* databases.

Definitely nice but it would be of even greater benefit if one could do a 4-part naming convention within these aggregate groups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across this capability in SQL2k8 but was hoping it could replace the Linked Servers for doing multi-database queries. </p>
<p>Unfortunately this appears to be for multi-server admin scripted tasks. Where the databases and structures are identical on each of the Registered Servers in the Group. Such as with the sys.* databases.</p>
<p>Definitely nice but it would be of even greater benefit if one could do a 4-part naming convention within these aggregate groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev_Mck</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/06/14/sql-server-2008-ssms-feature-multi-server-queries/#comment-53010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kev_Mck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/?p=5352#comment-53010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a nice function.  Wouldn&#039;t have been my first choice for new features, but certainly a plus.

What irks me in 08 is that opening a table in SSMS only opens TOP 200

Sure, I can see the point of that being an OPTION.. but I couldn&#039;t find a way to stop it being the norm :\]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice function.  Wouldn&#8217;t have been my first choice for new features, but certainly a plus.</p>
<p>What irks me in 08 is that opening a table in SSMS only opens TOP 200</p>
<p>Sure, I can see the point of that being an OPTION.. but I couldn&#8217;t find a way to stop it being the norm :\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

