<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; 2008 &#8211; Introduction to Filtered Index &#8211; Improve performance with Filtered Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/</link>
	<description>Personal Notes of Pinal Dave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-212604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-212604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI,

Thanks for the wonderful article with the perfect example. 

Keep rocking:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI,</p>
<p>Thanks for the wonderful article with the perfect example. </p>
<p>Keep rocking:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lall</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-187752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Lall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-187752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,

Keep up the good work. We all who work in sql server admire your work.

Thanks and best regards,
Eric Lall]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>Keep up the good work. We all who work in sql server admire your work.</p>
<p>Thanks and best regards,<br />
Eric Lall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narendra</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-170864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[narendra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-170864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,

Thanks for the article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aarti</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-132656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aarti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 10:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-132656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pinal,


       Thanks for the article.

Nice explanation for SQL Server 2008 new feature]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>       Thanks for the article.</p>
<p>Nice explanation for SQL Server 2008 new feature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman Hansen</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-128344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roman Hansen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-128344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you can use LIKE in any case.
But…
I don’t understand what you mean with “a non-specified condition.”
As I said before, you can use LIKE and if you still want to cover all the data you always have the normal indexes as you use to use until now without any filter at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can use LIKE in any case.<br />
But…<br />
I don’t understand what you mean with “a non-specified condition.”<br />
As I said before, you can use LIKE and if you still want to cover all the data you always have the normal indexes as you use to use until now without any filter at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkata S Kumar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-122183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkata S Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-122183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi 
   iam new to sql server .so i want best examples for coding purpose.plz send me website
Regards
Venkat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
   iam new to sql server .so i want best examples for coding purpose.plz send me website<br />
Regards<br />
Venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonali</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-76224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-76224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent answer with good demonstration of eample.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent answer with good demonstration of eample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-67443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mario]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-67443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi I&#039;m new in the filtered index,I have table with millions of records and I belive that filtered index can help me,I try to use a field (indexed with filtered index) in a inner join but the performance it&#039;s the same

create table invoiceDetail (status int)

create index dbo.FilteredIndex ON invoiceDetail(status) where status in (1,2,4)

--invoiceDetail table has a million of records

So, I have a temporal table with the name  filterJoin with one field (filterValue) and two values (1,2)

I do the next query

select *
from invoiceDetail I
inner join filterJoin  F On I.status  and F.filterValue 

the query is too slow

but when i try with 

select *
from invoiceDetail I
where status in (1,2)

it&#039;s to fast

I try 

Hi I&#039;m new in the filtered index,I have table with millions of records and I belive that filtered index can help me,I try to use a field (indexed with filtered index) in a inner join but the performance it&#039;s the same

create table invoiceDetail (status int)

create index dbo.FilteredIndex ON invoiceDetail(status) where status in (1,2,4)

--invoiceDetail table has a million of records

So, I have a temporal table with the name  filterJoin with one field (filterValue) and two values (1,2)

I do the next query

select *
from invoiceDetail I
where  I.status  in (select * from filterJoin)

it&#039;s too slow and I need filter dinamically]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I&#8217;m new in the filtered index,I have table with millions of records and I belive that filtered index can help me,I try to use a field (indexed with filtered index) in a inner join but the performance it&#8217;s the same</p>
<p>create table invoiceDetail (status int)</p>
<p>create index dbo.FilteredIndex ON invoiceDetail(status) where status in (1,2,4)</p>
<p>&#8211;invoiceDetail table has a million of records</p>
<p>So, I have a temporal table with the name  filterJoin with one field (filterValue) and two values (1,2)</p>
<p>I do the next query</p>
<p>select *<br />
from invoiceDetail I<br />
inner join filterJoin  F On I.status  and F.filterValue </p>
<p>the query is too slow</p>
<p>but when i try with </p>
<p>select *<br />
from invoiceDetail I<br />
where status in (1,2)</p>
<p>it&#8217;s to fast</p>
<p>I try </p>
<p>Hi I&#8217;m new in the filtered index,I have table with millions of records and I belive that filtered index can help me,I try to use a field (indexed with filtered index) in a inner join but the performance it&#8217;s the same</p>
<p>create table invoiceDetail (status int)</p>
<p>create index dbo.FilteredIndex ON invoiceDetail(status) where status in (1,2,4)</p>
<p>&#8211;invoiceDetail table has a million of records</p>
<p>So, I have a temporal table with the name  filterJoin with one field (filterValue) and two values (1,2)</p>
<p>I do the next query</p>
<p>select *<br />
from invoiceDetail I<br />
where  I.status  in (select * from filterJoin)</p>
<p>it&#8217;s too slow and I need filter dinamically</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijileads</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-57472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vijileads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-57472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

good explanation. i am trying to implement.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>good explanation. i am trying to implement&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furkan Balun</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-55138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Furkan Balun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-55138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

how many filtered index can we create on a table? we may want to execute a query with a few where condition and what do we have to do in this situation? and the other question is that if we want to execute this query for a non-specified where condition like Title=&#039;Marketing&#039;, do we have to write condition as Title=&#039;%%&#039; ?? this article is very efficient but i thought theese questions after i read it.good works.thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>how many filtered index can we create on a table? we may want to execute a query with a few where condition and what do we have to do in this situation? and the other question is that if we want to execute this query for a non-specified where condition like Title=&#8217;Marketing&#8217;, do we have to write condition as Title=&#8217;%%&#8217; ?? this article is very efficient but i thought theese questions after i read it.good works.thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliezer Figueroa</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-53803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliezer Figueroa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-53803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometime you cant normalize be cause is a &quot;closed&quot; system but you are required to optimize. This is an administration feature not a developer feature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime you cant normalize be cause is a &#8220;closed&#8221; system but you are required to optimize. This is an administration feature not a developer feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-45842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-45842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this particular instance, if you will be sharing so many titles amongst your employees, you need to normalise your data structure and represent the Title in a separate table, with a FK reference the the Employee table. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this particular instance, if you will be sharing so many titles amongst your employees, you need to normalise your data structure and represent the Title in a separate table, with a FK reference the the Employee table. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Burnett</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-43963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Burnett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-43963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major reason I would want to do this on a table or view is to allow the full text service to use filtered indexes based on language. As I work with multilingual databases, I need to create either separate language specific tables for the same data or use views (which is how I currently do it).

It seems filtered views have too many gotchas for me in this situation:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major reason I would want to do this on a table or view is to allow the full text service to use filtered indexes based on language. As I work with multilingual databases, I need to create either separate language specific tables for the same data or use views (which is how I currently do it).</p>
<p>It seems filtered views have too many gotchas for me in this situation:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

