<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER - 2008 - Introduction to Filtered Index - Improve performance with Filtered Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/</link>
	<description>Notes of a SQL Server MVP and Database Administrator</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Burnett</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/09/01/sql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index/#comment-43963</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=933#comment-43963</guid>
		<description>A major reason I would want to do this on a table or view is to allow the full text service to use filtered indexes based on language. As I work with multilingual databases, I need to create either separate language specific tables for the same data or use views (which is how I currently do it).

It seems filtered views have too many gotchas for me in this situation:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major reason I would want to do this on a table or view is to allow the full text service to use filtered indexes based on language. As I work with multilingual databases, I need to create either separate language specific tables for the same data or use views (which is how I currently do it).</p>
<p>It seems filtered views have too many gotchas for me in this situation:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
