<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER - Detailed Explanation of Transaction Lock, Lock Type, Avoid Locks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/</link>
	<description>Notes of a SQL Server MVP and Database Administrator</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kushal Kumar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-44902</link>
		<dc:creator>Kushal Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-44902</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Excellent...
please provide some more knowledge about Level-2,3,4 also.
It will be very helpful.

Thanks,
Kushal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Excellent&#8230;<br />
please provide some more knowledge about Level-2,3,4 also.<br />
It will be very helpful.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Kushal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praveen</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-43918</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-43918</guid>
		<description>Thanks buddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks buddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cer</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-43461</link>
		<dc:creator>cer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-43461</guid>
		<description>Jitendra:
   Actually there are 5 isolation levels in SQL Server 2005 and newer, but only 4 in SQL Server 2000, since SNAPSHOT is not an option there.
Excellent post, as usual from Pinal Dave.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jitendra:<br />
   Actually there are 5 isolation levels in SQL Server 2005 and newer, but only 4 in SQL Server 2000, since SNAPSHOT is not an option there.<br />
Excellent post, as usual from Pinal Dave.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-43326</link>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-43326</guid>
		<description>concept is crystal clear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>concept is crystal clear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Herbert</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-42713</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-42713</guid>
		<description>I'm glad you've noticed that mistake about READ UNCOMMITTED, as I was about to get really confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ve noticed that mistake about READ UNCOMMITTED, as I was about to get really confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-42618</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran Mohammed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-42618</guid>
		<description>@ Jitender, 

I agree 

Level 0 : Read uncommited  (lowest level)
Level 1: Read committed  which is default. 

I think I wrote it by mistake. Thanks for correcting me... 

Thanks,
Imran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jitender, </p>
<p>I agree </p>
<p>Level 0 : Read uncommited  (lowest level)<br />
Level 1: Read committed  which is default. </p>
<p>I think I wrote it by mistake. Thanks for correcting me&#8230; </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Imran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitendra Luniya</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-42596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitendra Luniya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-42596</guid>
		<description>Hi,

There is some wrong information published in the content. It's said that "level1 is the default isolation level of the database." and also mentioned level1 is READ UNCOMMITED. 

Actually there are 5 isolation levels as
READ UNCOMMITTED
READ COMMITTED
REPEATABLE READ
SNAPSHOT
SERIALIZABLE

and READ COMMITED is default level.

Thanks - JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>There is some wrong information published in the content. It&#8217;s said that &#8220;level1 is the default isolation level of the database.&#8221; and also mentioned level1 is READ UNCOMMITED. </p>
<p>Actually there are 5 isolation levels as<br />
READ UNCOMMITTED<br />
READ COMMITTED<br />
REPEATABLE READ<br />
SNAPSHOT<br />
SERIALIZABLE</p>
<p>and READ COMMITED is default level.</p>
<p>Thanks - JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy vann</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-42564</link>
		<dc:creator>guy vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-42564</guid>
		<description>Imran Mohammed

  thanks for the information on Transaction Lock , I was what we were looking for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imran Mohammed</p>
<p>  thanks for the information on Transaction Lock , I was what we were looking for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy vann</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-42444</link>
		<dc:creator>guy vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-42444</guid>
		<description>We have a SQL application, If someone in one site opens it before anyone else is using it, no one else can open the program.
it gives this error "another program is using this file"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a SQL application, If someone in one site opens it before anyone else is using it, no one else can open the program.<br />
it gives this error &#8220;another program is using this file&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palani</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/08/18/sql-server-detailed-explanation-of-transaction-lock-lock-type-avoid-locks/#comment-41902</link>
		<dc:creator>Palani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-41902</guid>
		<description>Hi 

How to generate select statement output into Excel or textual output

Please Let me know, is it possible?

by
Palani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>How to generate select statement output into Excel or textual output</p>
<p>Please Let me know, is it possible?</p>
<p>by<br />
Palani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
