<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; 2005 &#8211; Database Table Partitioning Tutorial &#8211; How to Horizontal Partition Database Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/</link>
	<description>Notes of a SQL Server MVP and Database Administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rupa</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-61676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-61676</guid>
		<description>hi Pinal, 

I found the data partitioning article interesting and tried to implement for my appliaction. The impletmentation discussed in this article is done. 

My doubt is regarding the deletion part,  in the site &quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345146(SQL.90).aspx &quot;, after creating a staging table the older data is switched and later the stagign table is dropped... 
Can you suggest any alternative mthod available to drop partion with lesaa complexity. 

Thanks in advance
Rupa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Pinal, </p>
<p>I found the data partitioning article interesting and tried to implement for my appliaction. The impletmentation discussed in this article is done. </p>
<p>My doubt is regarding the deletion part,  in the site &#8220;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345146(SQL.90).aspx &#8220;, after creating a staging table the older data is switched and later the stagign table is dropped&#8230;<br />
Can you suggest any alternative mthod available to drop partion with lesaa complexity. </p>
<p>Thanks in advance<br />
Rupa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-60805</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-60805</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have gone through your tutorial and havinf sme question. I have one table where it&#039;s aroung 500 million records now after reading your article i want o use partition.I have two date columnn in this table one is Recd_Date and another is Entered_Date.Now i want to create partition based on entered date and that should be monthly.I am afraid to do that becauase this table is currently using for production.

And i do not have any file group  in the database so needyour suggestion on this.

Sanjay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have gone through your tutorial and havinf sme question. I have one table where it&#8217;s aroung 500 million records now after reading your article i want o use partition.I have two date columnn in this table one is Recd_Date and another is Entered_Date.Now i want to create partition based on entered date and that should be monthly.I am afraid to do that becauase this table is currently using for production.</p>
<p>And i do not have any file group  in the database so needyour suggestion on this.</p>
<p>Sanjay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Yasir</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-60004</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran Yasir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-60004</guid>
		<description>Hi Pinal,How can I mention 50% records instead of mentioning first 10 records should store in one filegroup and rest should be stored in different filegroup?

If you dont know exactly how many records will be inserting into partioned table then you cant say first 10 records,then i would like to menion % instead of fix numbers.
Please can you reply with answere.

Imran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,How can I mention 50% records instead of mentioning first 10 records should store in one filegroup and rest should be stored in different filegroup?</p>
<p>If you dont know exactly how many records will be inserting into partioned table then you cant say first 10 records,then i would like to menion % instead of fix numbers.<br />
Please can you reply with answere.</p>
<p>Imran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oguzkaygun</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-58138</link>
		<dc:creator>oguzkaygun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-58138</guid>
		<description>Hello

if i create new coulums and new sql query (select, insert, update or delete) after i have do partition, Should i do partition again. Or my partition will see my new coulums and my new sql query. Also i can create new table too.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>if i create new coulums and new sql query (select, insert, update or delete) after i have do partition, Should i do partition again. Or my partition will see my new coulums and my new sql query. Also i can create new table too.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oguzkaygun</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-58137</link>
		<dc:creator>oguzkaygun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-58137</guid>
		<description>Hello
where are answers about questions related to this topic ?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
where are answers about questions related to this topic ?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shital</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-57405</link>
		<dc:creator>Shital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-57405</guid>
		<description>Hello pinal,
            I have been create a partition on existing table. this table having 10 to 12 indexes. so which index I would be drop and recreate.
  

pleases replay on mail id.

Thanks
 Shital</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello pinal,<br />
            I have been create a partition on existing table. this table having 10 to 12 indexes. so which index I would be drop and recreate.</p>
<p>pleases replay on mail id.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
 Shital</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subbarao</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-57146</link>
		<dc:creator>subbarao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-57146</guid>
		<description>Hi, I have table with 6 months data(11 lacs). On this table we are performing grouping. For that the query taking around 2 sec. This table already has the index. So to improve the performance I am trying to implement the partition based on date field. I want to partition the table into month wise. will it help to improve the performance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have table with 6 months data(11 lacs). On this table we are performing grouping. For that the query taking around 2 sec. This table already has the index. So to improve the performance I am trying to implement the partition based on date field. I want to partition the table into month wise. will it help to improve the performance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kumar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-56439</link>
		<dc:creator>kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-56439</guid>
		<description>i have more then 5 rows in one table(i,e table1) i need to copy the rows into other table (i&#039;e table2) which have its own rows in it. 
when i try
INSERT tbl_Education (
Standard,
School,
Board
)
 SELECT Standard,School,
Board FROM tbl_Prev_Education

then it is just inserting one row (if tbl_Prev_Education has one row)
when tbl_Prev_Education has more then one row then it is not inserting in to tbl_Education table

anyone plz help me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have more then 5 rows in one table(i,e table1) i need to copy the rows into other table (i&#8217;e table2) which have its own rows in it.<br />
when i try<br />
INSERT tbl_Education (<br />
Standard,<br />
School,<br />
Board<br />
)<br />
 SELECT Standard,School,<br />
Board FROM tbl_Prev_Education</p>
<p>then it is just inserting one row (if tbl_Prev_Education has one row)<br />
when tbl_Prev_Education has more then one row then it is not inserting in to tbl_Education table</p>
<p>anyone plz help me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brijesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-54823</link>
		<dc:creator>Brijesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-54823</guid>
		<description>Hi Pinal,

I have a requirement where a table on its own is 600GB and the data is kept for 30 days. Every weekend there is a job which triggers 40 others bulk insert jobs which pumps data into the database from different locations.
Since there is no common factor to create the partition I have decided to create it based on day
example
Every months has got 1,2,3,4..........30 or 31
so through of creating 31 file groups and attached 31 file ndf files.

I am not sure if this can be done as I tried couple of times but the partition cannot pick up values from the getdate() field...

Any help would be really appropriated!

Thanks
Brijesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>I have a requirement where a table on its own is 600GB and the data is kept for 30 days. Every weekend there is a job which triggers 40 others bulk insert jobs which pumps data into the database from different locations.<br />
Since there is no common factor to create the partition I have decided to create it based on day<br />
example<br />
Every months has got 1,2,3,4&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.30 or 31<br />
so through of creating 31 file groups and attached 31 file ndf files.</p>
<p>I am not sure if this can be done as I tried couple of times but the partition cannot pick up values from the getdate() field&#8230;</p>
<p>Any help would be really appropriated!</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Brijesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xuan Thang</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-53129</link>
		<dc:creator>Xuan Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-53129</guid>
		<description>Hi Pinal Dave,

I have a very big database, so it takes me about 1 hours to run one report. Can I use partion to divide my database to many smaller partition by every month? Can we store the data of one month in one partition?

Example:

partition_2009_01: will store all data which insert in January.
partition_2009_02: will store all data which insert in February.
......

Thanks and Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal Dave,</p>
<p>I have a very big database, so it takes me about 1 hours to run one report. Can I use partion to divide my database to many smaller partition by every month? Can we store the data of one month in one partition?</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p>partition_2009_01: will store all data which insert in January.<br />
partition_2009_02: will store all data which insert in February.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks and Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-51966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-51966</guid>
		<description>The question asked about queries not using the partion key was good I just dont see an answer.
Do youhave to query by the partition key to get the benefits of the partitions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question asked about queries not using the partion key was good I just dont see an answer.<br />
Do youhave to query by the partition key to get the benefits of the partitions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Husain</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-50946</link>
		<dc:creator>Husain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-50946</guid>
		<description>I have crores of records in a table and lakhs or record  are added everyday. 

Will partitioning improve performance drastically and if yes how many partitions would be most suitable to have on these many number of records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have crores of records in a table and lakhs or record  are added everyday. </p>
<p>Will partitioning improve performance drastically and if yes how many partitions would be most suitable to have on these many number of records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qainan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-50363</link>
		<dc:creator>Qainan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-50363</guid>
		<description>I would like to know, that i have 22 million records and i want to increase performance of application which design is better for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know, that i have 22 million records and i want to increase performance of application which design is better for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-48209</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran Mohammed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-48209</guid>
		<description>@Milni, 

To Start, I would say...

Create new datafiles in same or different hard disk to improve IO Performance ( if it is raid 5 or 10 then for DR ).

Again each datafile can have multiple file groups, you can have similar objects created under one filegroup, like all tables in one filegroup and all Indexes in other file group ( this gives you oppurtunity to take backup of individual filegroup, also improves performance ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Milni, </p>
<p>To Start, I would say&#8230;</p>
<p>Create new datafiles in same or different hard disk to improve IO Performance ( if it is raid 5 or 10 then for DR ).</p>
<p>Again each datafile can have multiple file groups, you can have similar objects created under one filegroup, like all tables in one filegroup and all Indexes in other file group ( this gives you oppurtunity to take backup of individual filegroup, also improves performance ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minli</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-48165</link>
		<dc:creator>Minli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-48165</guid>
		<description>I like to know How I can partition my existing database.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to know How I can partition my existing database.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaser</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-47759</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-47759</guid>
		<description>hi, i need help please can any body help, 
i want to retrieve data from one table, between two given dates, if these dates are of different years example 2008 &amp; 2009, then im getting error. im converting with the convert function with the code 101.
any help in this regard will be help full.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, i need help please can any body help,<br />
i want to retrieve data from one table, between two given dates, if these dates are of different years example 2008 &amp; 2009, then im getting error. im converting with the convert function with the code 101.<br />
any help in this regard will be help full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mounika</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-46932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mounika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-46932</guid>
		<description>Hi,

My Database is a Decision Support System.

I have table that contains 100 Million records, and each day we bulk copy and insert  300,000 more records. The main problem we are facing is as per our logic, the data for the past 25 days is only required when performing other business logic. We do not want to have archiving and moving old data to history tables, so any given day all the data for the last 2 years exist. Now my problem is when creating indexes I dont need the index to be on the previous months rather than I need the index if it can cover the last 1 month of Date range. If I do table partitioning how will be my performance increase or is there any other way round for this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>My Database is a Decision Support System.</p>
<p>I have table that contains 100 Million records, and each day we bulk copy and insert  300,000 more records. The main problem we are facing is as per our logic, the data for the past 25 days is only required when performing other business logic. We do not want to have archiving and moving old data to history tables, so any given day all the data for the last 2 years exist. Now my problem is when creating indexes I dont need the index to be on the previous months rather than I need the index if it can cover the last 1 month of Date range. If I do table partitioning how will be my performance increase or is there any other way round for this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-46858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-46858</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to automate backup and testing restore process for all partitioned databases on a server. I have databases partioned for each month and i would like to backup only recent 3 years of data and the rest would like to backup only once in FULL. is this possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to automate backup and testing restore process for all partitioned databases on a server. I have databases partioned for each month and i would like to backup only recent 3 years of data and the rest would like to backup only once in FULL. is this possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasanna</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-46763</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-46763</guid>
		<description>I have doubt on this, how do partitioning on the existing tables?

you have partitioned for new table but how do we know this table gets filled in future? I am not clear this point (New table partitioning) can u clear me out this?


Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have doubt on this, how do partitioning on the existing tables?</p>
<p>you have partitioned for new table but how do we know this table gets filled in future? I am not clear this point (New table partitioning) can u clear me out this?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinkas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-46737</link>
		<dc:creator>vinkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-46737</guid>
		<description>&#039;C:\Data\Primary\TestDB_Part1.mdf&#039;,
                SIZE=2,
                MAXSIZE=100,
                FILEGROWTH=1 ),
            FILEGROUP TestDB_Part2
    (NAME = &#039;TestDB_Part2&#039;,
                FILENAME =
        &#039;C:\Data\Secondary\&lt;b&gt;TestDB_Part2.ndf&lt;/b&gt;&#039;,


i have one doubt in the post. Here &#039;TestDB_Part2.ndf&#039; is &#039;.mdf&#039; or &#039;.ndf&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;C:\Data\Primary\TestDB_Part1.mdf&#8217;,<br />
                SIZE=2,<br />
                MAXSIZE=100,<br />
                FILEGROWTH=1 ),<br />
            FILEGROUP TestDB_Part2<br />
    (NAME = &#8216;TestDB_Part2&#8242;,<br />
                FILENAME =<br />
        &#8216;C:\Data\Secondary\<b>TestDB_Part2.ndf</b>&#8216;,</p>
<p>i have one doubt in the post. Here &#8216;TestDB_Part2.ndf&#8217; is &#8216;.mdf&#8217; or &#8216;.ndf&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manu</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-45449</link>
		<dc:creator>Manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-45449</guid>
		<description>Hooman,

Did u succeed in your project , Can you please share your knowledge ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooman,</p>
<p>Did u succeed in your project , Can you please share your knowledge ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anoop Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-45448</link>
		<dc:creator>Anoop Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-45448</guid>
		<description>Hi Pinal,

This article is excellant. Thanks for this.
I have a very huge table and i wish to partition this table based on a date field with out affecting other tables. How can i partition this table which has millions of records? Any impacts on partitioning a table which has data?  

Thanks In Advance,
Anoop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pinal,</p>
<p>This article is excellant. Thanks for this.<br />
I have a very huge table and i wish to partition this table based on a date field with out affecting other tables. How can i partition this table which has millions of records? Any impacts on partitioning a table which has data?  </p>
<p>Thanks In Advance,<br />
Anoop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phani</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-45398</link>
		<dc:creator>Phani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-45398</guid>
		<description>Can i create a partition with multiple columns as my partition key. If Yes, can you give an example for me. Iam  in a pressing need for that please do reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i create a partition with multiple columns as my partition key. If Yes, can you give an example for me. Iam  in a pressing need for that please do reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-44976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-44976</guid>
		<description>Hi pinal,

We are facing some problems in our company.

we have a very huge dataset ~100M and we have used partitioning for the same. 
All the data was supposed to be residing in the partitions created according to the statecodes but the size of primary mdf file has increased to a bulk. 
Can you suggest a solution or reason for.

Regards 
Ajay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi pinal,</p>
<p>We are facing some problems in our company.</p>
<p>we have a very huge dataset ~100M and we have used partitioning for the same.<br />
All the data was supposed to be residing in the partitions created according to the statecodes but the size of primary mdf file has increased to a bulk.<br />
Can you suggest a solution or reason for.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Ajay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooman</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/01/25/sql-server-2005-database-table-partitioning-tutorial-how-to-horizontal-partition-database-table/#comment-44934</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/?p=485#comment-44934</guid>
		<description>Hi
I created 5 partitions for my table as the following code:

CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION ParitioningTest_PartitionRange(nchar(4))
AS 
RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES (&#039;CARD&#039;, &#039;CBO&#039;, &#039;CHEQ&#039;, &#039;CUST&#039;, &#039;TELL&#039;)


CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ParitioningTest_PartitionScheme
AS PARTITION ParitioningTest_PartitionRange
TO ([FG_CARD], [FG_CBO], 
	[FG_CHEQ],[FG_CUST],
	[FG_TELL], [FG]);


Now I dont know how to move records from &#039;Transaction_Summary&#039; table to this partitions.

I should mention that all this partitioning is for this &quot;Transaction_Summary&quot; which has more than 100 million records and there in a CHAR(4) field in this table called &quot;Channel&quot; which doesnt have an index(there is an id column which is primary key&quot; and  I want to do the partitioning based on this filed, I know if that filed was a primary ke I could say

Drop index Transaction_Summary_IXC on Transaction_Summary with (Move To [ParitioningTest_PartitionScheme] (Channel) )

But I dont know what to do in this case, could you please help me?

Regards,
Hooman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I created 5 partitions for my table as the following code:</p>
<p>CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION ParitioningTest_PartitionRange(nchar(4))<br />
AS<br />
RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES (&#8216;CARD&#8217;, &#8216;CBO&#8217;, &#8216;CHEQ&#8217;, &#8216;CUST&#8217;, &#8216;TELL&#8217;)</p>
<p>CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ParitioningTest_PartitionScheme<br />
AS PARTITION ParitioningTest_PartitionRange<br />
TO ([FG_CARD], [FG_CBO],<br />
	[FG_CHEQ],[FG_CUST],<br />
	[FG_TELL], [FG]);</p>
<p>Now I dont know how to move records from &#8216;Transaction_Summary&#8217; table to this partitions.</p>
<p>I should mention that all this partitioning is for this &#8220;Transaction_Summary&#8221; which has more than 100 million records and there in a CHAR(4) field in this table called &#8220;Channel&#8221; which doesnt have an index(there is an id column which is primary key&#8221; and  I want to do the partitioning based on this filed, I know if that filed was a primary ke I could say</p>
<p>Drop index Transaction_Summary_IXC on Transaction_Summary with (Move To [ParitioningTest_PartitionScheme] (Channel) )</p>
<p>But I dont know what to do in this case, could you please help me?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Hooman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
