Comments on: SQLAuthority News – NASDAQ Uses SQL Server 2005 – Reducing Costs through Better Data Management

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:04:25 +0000

… interesting that they chose not to use Oracle when replacing their ageing Mainframes.

Adam

By: james

james — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:09:21 +0000

…. but Nasdaq use Oracle for their large systems such as their 40TB Data Warehouse.

By: chanti

chanti — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:42:29 +0000

Hi Shashi,

I agree that sybase as good market now a days when compare to other Databases. I believe Sql also running faster.

Its up to you how you want to build your future.

Thanks,
Chanti

By: shashi kant

shashi kant — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:17:59 +0000

Hi pinal Dave,

I hear the same news and happy that sql now comes in the top layer, But i have a confusion to take a descion whether to go in sybase or stick with Sql

I have a Past Two year of experenice as a Sql DBA + Developer
But now i have the option to work with sql or sybase not both
for next 2 years.

previously so many sybase guys said that u know sybase have the hold in the corprate environment and Nasdaq is running on sybase and all other financial players working on sybase , so they argue that sybase market is good and i am not feel confident with this as i worked with that for copule of months , i bore with the CUI based presentation of sybase

so i want your suggest whether to move or stick with sql

Regards
shashi kant