<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Fix : Error 1205 : Transaction (Process ID) was deadlocked on resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/</link>
	<description>Notes of a SQL Server MVP and Database Administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:54:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hi</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-57350</link>
		<dc:creator>hi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-57350</guid>
		<description>To the moderaor,

Please ensure that special characters (like  etc) are blocked in your site. Malicious code could be injected into this site by hackers.

Regards,
A Well Wisher... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the moderaor,</p>
<p>Please ensure that special characters (like  etc) are blocked in your site. Malicious code could be injected into this site by hackers.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
A Well Wisher&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrityunjoy Chatterjee</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-55350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrityunjoy Chatterjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-55350</guid>
		<description>I am working with SQL SERVER 2008.I am facing the same issues of deadlock in the database in specific two stored procedures.Both of them has few updates and inserts in the physical tables of the database.I have also used  temporary table variable to store data temporarily and have then to fetch it in the same stored procedure.My procedures are being called from .net 2.0. I am using the database isolation level as read committed. I have also used proper transaction blocks and try -catch handler in my stored procedure.The issue is only geting replicated in the production environment which has 250 users accessing the system concurrently.Can anyone please suggest the cause and the fix of this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working with SQL SERVER 2008.I am facing the same issues of deadlock in the database in specific two stored procedures.Both of them has few updates and inserts in the physical tables of the database.I have also used  temporary table variable to store data temporarily and have then to fetch it in the same stored procedure.My procedures are being called from .net 2.0. I am using the database isolation level as read committed. I have also used proper transaction blocks and try -catch handler in my stored procedure.The issue is only geting replicated in the production environment which has 250 users accessing the system concurrently.Can anyone please suggest the cause and the fix of this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himanshu</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-50133</link>
		<dc:creator>Himanshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-50133</guid>
		<description>Dear Friends,
I am using SQL 2000 with RAMCO ERP, HP DL360G5 Server with 8GB  RAM, RAID 5, HDD 4x15000RPM &amp; utlization 7.74GB RAM Total Database size 70GB but too much blocking happned in my server. After Restart server will functional normal for 4 to 5 hours after again reduced performance. SP4 with HOtfix all installed in server Setting 
name                                minimum     maximum     config_value run_value   
----------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- 
affinity mask                       -2147483648 2147483647  0            0
allow updates                       0           1           0            0
awe enabled                         0           1           1            1
c2 audit mode                       0           1           0            0
cost threshold for parallelism      0           32767       10           10
Cross DB Ownership Chaining         0           1           0            0
cursor threshold                    -1          2147483647  -1           -1
default full-text language          0           2147483647  1033         1033
default language                    0           9999        0            0
fill factor (%)                     0           100         51           51
index create memory (KB)            704         2147483647  0            0
lightweight pooling                 0           1           0            0
locks                               5000        2147483647  0            0
max degree of parallelism           0           32          4            4
max server memory (MB)              4           2147483647  7449         7449
max text repl size (B)              0           2147483647  65536        65536
max worker threads                  32          32767       255          255
media retention                     0           365         0            0
min memory per query (KB)           512         2147483647  6666         6666
min server memory (MB)              0           2147483647  3071         3071
nested triggers                     0           1           1            1
network packet size (B)             512         32767       4096         4096
open objects                        0           2147483647  0            0
priority boost                      0           1           1            1
query governor cost limit           0           2147483647  0            0
query wait (s)                      -1          2147483647  -1           -1
recovery interval (min)             0           32767       0            0
remote access                       0           1           0            0
remote login timeout (s)            0           2147483647  20           20
remote proc trans                   0           1           0            0
remote query timeout (s)            0           2147483647  600          600
scan for startup procs              0           1           0            0
set working set size                0           1           1            1
show advanced options               0           1           1            1
two digit year cutoff               1753        9999        2049         2049
user connections                    0           32767       0            0
user options                        0           32767       0            0

Please help me how to reduce blocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Friends,<br />
I am using SQL 2000 with RAMCO ERP, HP DL360G5 Server with 8GB  RAM, RAID 5, HDD 4&#215;15000RPM &amp; utlization 7.74GB RAM Total Database size 70GB but too much blocking happned in my server. After Restart server will functional normal for 4 to 5 hours after again reduced performance. SP4 with HOtfix all installed in server Setting<br />
name                                minimum     maximum     config_value run_value<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
affinity mask                       -2147483648 2147483647  0            0<br />
allow updates                       0           1           0            0<br />
awe enabled                         0           1           1            1<br />
c2 audit mode                       0           1           0            0<br />
cost threshold for parallelism      0           32767       10           10<br />
Cross DB Ownership Chaining         0           1           0            0<br />
cursor threshold                    -1          2147483647  -1           -1<br />
default full-text language          0           2147483647  1033         1033<br />
default language                    0           9999        0            0<br />
fill factor (%)                     0           100         51           51<br />
index create memory (KB)            704         2147483647  0            0<br />
lightweight pooling                 0           1           0            0<br />
locks                               5000        2147483647  0            0<br />
max degree of parallelism           0           32          4            4<br />
max server memory (MB)              4           2147483647  7449         7449<br />
max text repl size (B)              0           2147483647  65536        65536<br />
max worker threads                  32          32767       255          255<br />
media retention                     0           365         0            0<br />
min memory per query (KB)           512         2147483647  6666         6666<br />
min server memory (MB)              0           2147483647  3071         3071<br />
nested triggers                     0           1           1            1<br />
network packet size (B)             512         32767       4096         4096<br />
open objects                        0           2147483647  0            0<br />
priority boost                      0           1           1            1<br />
query governor cost limit           0           2147483647  0            0<br />
query wait (s)                      -1          2147483647  -1           -1<br />
recovery interval (min)             0           32767       0            0<br />
remote access                       0           1           0            0<br />
remote login timeout (s)            0           2147483647  20           20<br />
remote proc trans                   0           1           0            0<br />
remote query timeout (s)            0           2147483647  600          600<br />
scan for startup procs              0           1           0            0<br />
set working set size                0           1           1            1<br />
show advanced options               0           1           1            1<br />
two digit year cutoff               1753        9999        2049         2049<br />
user connections                    0           32767       0            0<br />
user options                        0           32767       0            0</p>
<p>Please help me how to reduce blocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-48261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-48261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m receiving this with my accounting package, generally when posting batches. If I understand this correctly, the SQL server is telling the application that it&#039;s not able to write its transaction at this time.

What the application SHOULD do at this point, is to pause and attempt to re-post its data to the SQL server after a short delay. Would that be correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m receiving this with my accounting package, generally when posting batches. If I understand this correctly, the SQL server is telling the application that it&#8217;s not able to write its transaction at this time.</p>
<p>What the application SHOULD do at this point, is to pause and attempt to re-post its data to the SQL server after a short delay. Would that be correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER - Guidelines and Coding Standards Part - 2 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-47507</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL SERVER - Guidelines and Coding Standards Part - 2 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-47507</guid>
		<description>[...] Always access tables in the same order in all stored procedure and triggers consistently. This will avoid deadlocks. (Read More Here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Always access tables in the same order in all stored procedure and triggers consistently. This will avoid deadlocks. (Read More Here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pramod</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-46523</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-46523</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I am observing this error when i do a set of action in application using  SQL Server 2008 Database.
 
SQL Message: Transaction (Process Id ??) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.

I understand what deadlock is, but I am not able to relate it to the action in Application. 
If the deadlock happen when it was doing Insert into table, does that tell something about deadlock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am observing this error when i do a set of action in application using  SQL Server 2008 Database.</p>
<p>SQL Message: Transaction (Process Id ??) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.</p>
<p>I understand what deadlock is, but I am not able to relate it to the action in Application.<br />
If the deadlock happen when it was doing Insert into table, does that tell something about deadlock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-46490</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-46490</guid>
		<description>Hi , me facing the same error , We are running stored procedure one by one with out keeping a time gap, now the problem is that i have to track where in the procedure deadlock is coming .. i have to figure out that so that we can fix that part of coding ..
Its real urgent do help..
If possible send the Solution in my mail ashish_vbtecno@indiatimes.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi , me facing the same error , We are running stored procedure one by one with out keeping a time gap, now the problem is that i have to track where in the procedure deadlock is coming .. i have to figure out that so that we can fix that part of coding ..<br />
Its real urgent do help..<br />
If possible send the Solution in my mail <a href="mailto:ashish_vbtecno@indiatimes.com">ashish_vbtecno@indiatimes.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary F</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-44914</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-44914</guid>
		<description>MS SQL 2005 is supposed to be a multi-user database, unlike Access, so why isn&#039;t it smart enough to queue up the requests and process them in a linear fashion if it&#039;s otherwise going to cause a deadlock?

I&#039;ve got a SP that takes less than 300ms to run consisting of a few selects, updates and inserts. I saw the deadlock error on 4 computers when users tried to run the same SP (with different params) within a second or two of each other. Only 1 person didn&#039;t get an error. SQL should just queue the requests to avoid creating deadlock victims. I&#039;m very annoyed with it, I thought it was smarter than that. It should be for what it costs. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS SQL 2005 is supposed to be a multi-user database, unlike Access, so why isn&#8217;t it smart enough to queue up the requests and process them in a linear fashion if it&#8217;s otherwise going to cause a deadlock?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a SP that takes less than 300ms to run consisting of a few selects, updates and inserts. I saw the deadlock error on 4 computers when users tried to run the same SP (with different params) within a second or two of each other. Only 1 person didn&#8217;t get an error. SQL should just queue the requests to avoid creating deadlock victims. I&#8217;m very annoyed with it, I thought it was smarter than that. It should be for what it costs. :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anasouf</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-42544</link>
		<dc:creator>Anasouf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-42544</guid>
		<description>Hi Randy!

You can use the stored procedure SP_WHO2

Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy!</p>
<p>You can use the stored procedure SP_WHO2</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Pierce</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-41596</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-41596</guid>
		<description>Can I find out which users are using which process?

Deadlock occurs when two users have locks on separate objects and each user wants a lock on the other’s object. 

I have a feeling that one of the users does not need to be there. I logged on with two seperate accounts and setup replication.

The first, which I used the wrong account might be in there still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I find out which users are using which process?</p>
<p>Deadlock occurs when two users have locks on separate objects and each user wants a lock on the other’s object. </p>
<p>I have a feeling that one of the users does not need to be there. I logged on with two seperate accounts and setup replication.</p>
<p>The first, which I used the wrong account might be in there still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-34499</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-34499</guid>
		<description>Pinal, you have an awesome website!  I am a novice at SQL and I have run into this issue:

System Error System Error DB: Exception encountered. Table: PATIENT/STUDY Operation: FINDFIRST Id:   Error: Transaction (Process ID 62) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
 State:40001,Native:1205,Origin:[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]

How do I fix this, what is happening is the Dicom service which is reporting this is stopping once a day with this message and it is critical because it is a hospital and this service need to run non-stop.  Could you please help?

Thank you in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinal, you have an awesome website!  I am a novice at SQL and I have run into this issue:</p>
<p>System Error System Error DB: Exception encountered. Table: PATIENT/STUDY Operation: FINDFIRST Id:   Error: Transaction (Process ID 62) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.<br />
 State:40001,Native:1205,Origin:[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]</p>
<p>How do I fix this, what is happening is the Dicom service which is reporting this is stopping once a day with this message and it is critical because it is a hospital and this service need to run non-stop.  Could you please help?</p>
<p>Thank you in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitesha</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-34244</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitesha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-34244</guid>
		<description>Hi..

I have also received the Error “Error 1205 : Transaction (Process ID) was deadlocked on resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction”
.
could you please tell me how to fix this error. I am using two diffeent VB Applications whis use same SQL Server 2000 database.
I have found the one process which became a victim. Could you please let me know where to set up the DEADLOCK_PRIORITY as i am new in SQL server 2000. I really appreciate your help.

Regards
Nitesha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi..</p>
<p>I have also received the Error “Error 1205 : Transaction (Process ID) was deadlocked on resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction”<br />
.<br />
could you please tell me how to fix this error. I am using two diffeent VB Applications whis use same SQL Server 2000 database.<br />
I have found the one process which became a victim. Could you please let me know where to set up the DEADLOCK_PRIORITY as i am new in SQL server 2000. I really appreciate your help.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Nitesha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitesha Patel</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-25728</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitesha Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-25728</guid>
		<description>Hi..

I have also received the Error &quot;Error 1205 : Transaction (Process ID) was deadlocked on resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction”
.
could you please tell me how to fix this error. I am using two diffeent VB Applications whis use same SQL Server 2000 database.
I have found the one process which became a victim. Could you please let me know where to set up the DEADLOCK_PRIORITY as i am new in SQL server 2000. I really appreciate your help.

Regards
Nitesha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi..</p>
<p>I have also received the Error &#8220;Error 1205 : Transaction (Process ID) was deadlocked on resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction”<br />
.<br />
could you please tell me how to fix this error. I am using two diffeent VB Applications whis use same SQL Server 2000 database.<br />
I have found the one process which became a victim. Could you please let me know where to set up the DEADLOCK_PRIORITY as i am new in SQL server 2000. I really appreciate your help.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Nitesha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayathri k</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-23491</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayathri k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/16/sql-server-fix-error-1205-transaction-process-id-was-deadlocked-on-resources-with-another-process-and-has-been-chosen-as-the-deadlock-victim-rerun-the-transaction/#comment-23491</guid>
		<description>Got the exact error but unable to resolve as I am trying to shink the database</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got the exact error but unable to resolve as I am trying to shink the database</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
