<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Understanding new Index Type of SQL Server 2005 Included Column Index along with Clustered Index and Non-clustered Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/</link>
	<description>Notes of a SQL Server MVP and Database Administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:54:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ali Bajwa</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-56229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Bajwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-56229</guid>
		<description>Hi Supriya,

A heap is a table without a clustered index. read more at the below BOL link:

ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v9/MS.SQLSVR.v9.en/udb9/html/72f63db6-7306-4c43-a73d-7eaa4ffe1f82.htm

Note: you will need to paste this link in BOL.
Start&gt;Programs&gt;Microsoft SQl Server 2005&gt;Documentation and Tutorials&gt; SQL Server Books Online</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Supriya,</p>
<p>A heap is a table without a clustered index. read more at the below BOL link:</p>
<p>ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v9/MS.SQLSVR.v9.en/udb9/html/72f63db6-7306-4c43-a73d-7eaa4ffe1f82.htm</p>
<p>Note: you will need to paste this link in BOL.<br />
Start&gt;Programs&gt;Microsoft SQl Server 2005&gt;Documentation and Tutorials&gt; SQL Server Books Online</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQLAuthority News - Best Articles on SQLAuthority.com Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-47198</link>
		<dc:creator>SQLAuthority News - Best Articles on SQLAuthority.com Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-47198</guid>
		<description>[...] SQL SERVER - Understanding new Index Type of SQL Server 2005 Included Column Index along with Cluste... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SQL SERVER &#8211; Understanding new Index Type of SQL Server 2005 Included Column Index along with Cluste&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supriya</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-45424</link>
		<dc:creator>supriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-45424</guid>
		<description>hello pinal sir
actually m new with sql server m a student just learning sql
i have a question that in which case sql creates heap table?
or table is created as heap table?
 please bear with me sir.
thank you so much for your site..
m getting lot of hepl from this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello pinal sir<br />
actually m new with sql server m a student just learning sql<br />
i have a question that in which case sql creates heap table?<br />
or table is created as heap table?<br />
 please bear with me sir.<br />
thank you so much for your site..<br />
m getting lot of hepl from this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER - 2008 - Interview Questions and Answers - Part 3 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-42748</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL SERVER - 2008 - Interview Questions and Answers - Part 3 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-42748</guid>
		<description>[...] What are the difference between clustered and a non-clustered index? (Read More Here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What are the difference between clustered and a non-clustered index? (Read More Here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankur</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-40603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-40603</guid>
		<description>HI,
    Can you please let me know the use of INCLUDE and what parameter to be used in INCLUDE (parameter)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI,<br />
    Can you please let me know the use of INCLUDE and what parameter to be used in INCLUDE (parameter)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thirunavukkarasu KS</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-40314</link>
		<dc:creator>Thirunavukkarasu KS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-40314</guid>
		<description>I have create composite Primary key constraint  but how to drop the constratint how it is possible ?


CREATE TABLE ORDER1 (
	order_id bigint NOT NULL,
	product_id int NOT NULL,
	order_date datetime NOT NULL,
	price decimal(21,2) NOT NULL,
	PRIMARY KEY (order_id, product_id, order_date)
	)

alter table Order1 drop constraint 

actually wirite this syntax  drop constraint and constraint name but above samplee how to identify the constraint name 

alter table employee drop constraint id_pkey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have create composite Primary key constraint  but how to drop the constratint how it is possible ?</p>
<p>CREATE TABLE ORDER1 (<br />
	order_id bigint NOT NULL,<br />
	product_id int NOT NULL,<br />
	order_date datetime NOT NULL,<br />
	price decimal(21,2) NOT NULL,<br />
	PRIMARY KEY (order_id, product_id, order_date)<br />
	)</p>
<p>alter table Order1 drop constraint </p>
<p>actually wirite this syntax  drop constraint and constraint name but above samplee how to identify the constraint name </p>
<p>alter table employee drop constraint id_pkey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sailaja</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-40054</link>
		<dc:creator>sailaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-40054</guid>
		<description>This is very helpful to me. Pl tell me how to test keys and indexes in SQL Server2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very helpful to me. Pl tell me how to test keys and indexes in SQL Server2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-39038</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-39038</guid>
		<description>Would you mind explaining me below:

I can make three primary keys in a table like 

CREATE TABLE ORDER (
 order_id bigint NOT NULL,
 product_id int NOT NULL,
 order_date datetime NOT NULL,
 price decimal(21,2) NOT NULL,
 ----------- columns ---------------

 PRIMARY KEY (order_id, product_id, order_date)
 )
GO

WELL, i can see three PK&#039;s in SQLMS. Are these really 3 Pk&#039;s or 1 PK or 2 composite keys?

As we create PK, we create an automatic Clustered index on the PK column. 

What would be in this case?

Would there be 3 Clustered indexes here? 

When i created this table and checked out the script by SQL server, i got script seems to have clustered index on a table instead of 3 above mentioned columns, so what does it mean?

 i will appreciate your help..

Leo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you mind explaining me below:</p>
<p>I can make three primary keys in a table like </p>
<p>CREATE TABLE ORDER (<br />
 order_id bigint NOT NULL,<br />
 product_id int NOT NULL,<br />
 order_date datetime NOT NULL,<br />
 price decimal(21,2) NOT NULL,<br />
 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; columns &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p> PRIMARY KEY (order_id, product_id, order_date)<br />
 )<br />
GO</p>
<p>WELL, i can see three PK&#8217;s in SQLMS. Are these really 3 Pk&#8217;s or 1 PK or 2 composite keys?</p>
<p>As we create PK, we create an automatic Clustered index on the PK column. </p>
<p>What would be in this case?</p>
<p>Would there be 3 Clustered indexes here? </p>
<p>When i created this table and checked out the script by SQL server, i got script seems to have clustered index on a table instead of 3 above mentioned columns, so what does it mean?</p>
<p> i will appreciate your help..</p>
<p>Leo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER - Introduction to Heap Structure - What is Heap? Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34838</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL SERVER - Introduction to Heap Structure - What is Heap? Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34838</guid>
		<description>[...] If you interested in learning more about Indexes read SQL SERVER - Understanding new Index Type of SQL Server 2005 Included Column Index along with Cluste... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you interested in learning more about Indexes read SQL SERVER &#8211; Understanding new Index Type of SQL Server 2005 Included Column Index along with Cluste&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34403</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34403</guid>
		<description>If I have more then 16 fields in a table that I want to index can I create a second index?

How does this affect performance?

Thanks,

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have more then 16 fields in a table that I want to index can I create a second index?</p>
<p>How does this affect performance?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34297</link>
		<dc:creator>Harish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34297</guid>
		<description>If I have a non-clustered index within the limitations of 16 fields and under 900 bytes as opposed to having 1 field with 15 included fields for the same - what is the difference in performance? Is there any advantage in using the included columns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have a non-clustered index within the limitations of 16 fields and under 900 bytes as opposed to having 1 field with 15 included fields for the same &#8211; what is the difference in performance? Is there any advantage in using the included columns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34249</guid>
		<description>If i do a sp_helpindex TABLE_NAME , I get the list of indexes on the table with thier columns, however, INCLUDED columns are not shown. is there a command to display index definitions along with their included columns?

Thanks,
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i do a sp_helpindex TABLE_NAME , I get the list of indexes on the table with thier columns, however, INCLUDED columns are not shown. is there a command to display index definitions along with their included columns?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34059</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-34059</guid>
		<description>how to delete clustered  index</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to delete clustered  index</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bala</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-27067</link>
		<dc:creator>Bala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-27067</guid>
		<description>hi

i ve created NC index on 2 tables, so while joining this two tbles, i get the result set, but while performing the Execution plan, the index of first table is considered, y so?

please reply me ASAP

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>i ve created NC index on 2 tables, so while joining this two tbles, i get the result set, but while performing the Execution plan, the index of first table is considered, y so?</p>
<p>please reply me ASAP</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopinath M</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-25528</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopinath M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-25528</guid>
		<description>pinal dave,

Your article is  very informative. As a reader i&#039;ve few suggestions for you. 

1) Please increase the font of SQL Code - gives more readability

2) Provide the color coding scheme of SQL Server so that we can easily understand the code snippet. There are may plugins  for writers like Windows Live Writer to provide color schemes for code.

Anyway, your article is very informative. Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pinal dave,</p>
<p>Your article is  very informative. As a reader i&#8217;ve few suggestions for you. </p>
<p>1) Please increase the font of SQL Code &#8211; gives more readability</p>
<p>2) Provide the color coding scheme of SQL Server so that we can easily understand the code snippet. There are may plugins  for writers like Windows Live Writer to provide color schemes for code.</p>
<p>Anyway, your article is very informative. Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tahir</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-25185</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-25185</guid>
		<description>Hi Sudha;

Creating index is a real challenge for some one. one needs to be carefull while creating index.
answer to your question How to decide to create non clustered index is simple.
if u want to get only one record then create non cluseterd index but if your query needs a range of records then better to create clustred index.
actually u need to see which type of query is accssing data more oftenly and then desing index accodingly.

Case: the other day i have a table with 9 M records
it has a PK on TransactionNo.
but i found no body is concerend about TransactionNo, every one is accessing data on TransactionDate column, giving range like where TransactionDate &gt;= getdate() -30 and TransactionDate &lt;=getdate() 

so my query was not using index properly. what i did i made PK ( whihc will be clustred index) on TransactionDate plus TransactionId.
and i am enjoying good performance.


Any one else can help me in this Case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sudha;</p>
<p>Creating index is a real challenge for some one. one needs to be carefull while creating index.<br />
answer to your question How to decide to create non clustered index is simple.<br />
if u want to get only one record then create non cluseterd index but if your query needs a range of records then better to create clustred index.<br />
actually u need to see which type of query is accssing data more oftenly and then desing index accodingly.</p>
<p>Case: the other day i have a table with 9 M records<br />
it has a PK on TransactionNo.<br />
but i found no body is concerend about TransactionNo, every one is accessing data on TransactionDate column, giving range like where TransactionDate &gt;= getdate() -30 and TransactionDate &lt;=getdate() </p>
<p>so my query was not using index properly. what i did i made PK ( whihc will be clustred index) on TransactionDate plus TransactionId.<br />
and i am enjoying good performance.</p>
<p>Any one else can help me in this Case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tahir</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-25183</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-25183</guid>
		<description>Hi Jivan,
from above lines we can conclude 
Composite index will increase the size of index as we add more columns to non clusuterd index where as we use Include which will not increase the number of index key columns or index key size limitations.
&quot; Non-key columns can be included in non-clustered index to avoid exceeding the current index size limitations of a maximum of 16 key columns and a maximum index key size of 900 bytes. 
Another advantage is that using non-key column in index we can have index data types not allowed as index key columns generally.&quot;

Hi Nidhi
Included Column Index  is for non clustered index only. to some level these are Covering Index but by-pass the limitation of earlier version of sql server as these don&#039;t conunt for the size of non clustered index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jivan,<br />
from above lines we can conclude<br />
Composite index will increase the size of index as we add more columns to non clusuterd index where as we use Include which will not increase the number of index key columns or index key size limitations.<br />
&#8221; Non-key columns can be included in non-clustered index to avoid exceeding the current index size limitations of a maximum of 16 key columns and a maximum index key size of 900 bytes.<br />
Another advantage is that using non-key column in index we can have index data types not allowed as index key columns generally.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi Nidhi<br />
Included Column Index  is for non clustered index only. to some level these are Covering Index but by-pass the limitation of earlier version of sql server as these don&#8217;t conunt for the size of non clustered index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudha</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-23600</link>
		<dc:creator>sudha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-23600</guid>
		<description>Hi ,

How do we decide whether to create non clustered index on a column.?

I have a scenario where query response is taking nearly 2 minutes for &lt;100 rows.
The major tables A B used in joining contain A-94million rows and B-4 million rows.

B.clientid primary key -- 4million

A.clientid -- distinct values -- 2 million

So is it worth to create non clustered index on A.clientid column on A Table(94 million rows) ? 

Will the join be faster and response better?
Appreciate your help !

Thanks
Sudha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,</p>
<p>How do we decide whether to create non clustered index on a column.?</p>
<p>I have a scenario where query response is taking nearly 2 minutes for &lt;100 rows.<br />
The major tables A B used in joining contain A-94million rows and B-4 million rows.</p>
<p>B.clientid primary key &#8212; 4million</p>
<p>A.clientid &#8212; distinct values &#8212; 2 million</p>
<p>So is it worth to create non clustered index on A.clientid column on A Table(94 million rows) ? </p>
<p>Will the join be faster and response better?<br />
Appreciate your help !</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Sudha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nidhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-22914</link>
		<dc:creator>Nidhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-22914</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Are the Included Column Index along with Clustered Index and Non-clustered Index same as covering indexes ... or there is any difference in them ????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Are the Included Column Index along with Clustered Index and Non-clustered Index same as covering indexes &#8230; or there is any difference in them ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/sql-server-understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-12925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/23/understanding-new-index-type-of-sql-server-2005-included-column-index-along-with-clustered-index-and-non-clustered-index/#comment-12925</guid>
		<description>Pinal,

Im not able to figure out the difference between a composite index and an index with included columns? It would be helpful to me if you explan this. Thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinal,</p>
<p>Im not able to figure out the difference between a composite index and an index with included columns? It would be helpful to me if you explan this. Thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
