<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL SERVER &#8211; Simple Cursor to Select Tables in Database with Static Prefix and Date Created</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/</link>
	<description>Notes of a SQL Server MVP and Database Administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:54:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-50735</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-50735</guid>
		<description>So I noticed that when you used NOCOUNT ON, you also used NOCOUNT OFF at the end of the SQL.

Would this be standard programming practice to pair the ON/OFF?  Would you still pair it if the SQL was part of a stored procedure, or just use the NOCOUNT ON and leave out the NOCOUNT OFF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I noticed that when you used NOCOUNT ON, you also used NOCOUNT OFF at the end of the SQL.</p>
<p>Would this be standard programming practice to pair the ON/OFF?  Would you still pair it if the SQL was part of a stored procedure, or just use the NOCOUNT ON and leave out the NOCOUNT OFF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL SERVER - Guidelines and Coding Standards Part - 1 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-47497</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL SERVER - Guidelines and Coding Standards Part - 1 Journey to SQL Authority with Pinal Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-47497</guid>
		<description>[...] Use SET NOCOUNT ON at the beginning of SQL Batches, Stored Procedures and Triggers. This improves the performance of Stored Procedure. (Read More Here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Use SET NOCOUNT ON at the beginning of SQL Batches, Stored Procedures and Triggers. This improves the performance of Stored Procedure. (Read More Here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveen</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-45404</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-45404</guid>
		<description>Except and Intersect is not working in MS-SQL 2005...
   May i know the solution or way to using these Operators in SQL Server 2005. If there is any possibility to use or not....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except and Intersect is not working in MS-SQL 2005&#8230;<br />
   May i know the solution or way to using these Operators in SQL Server 2005. If there is any possibility to use or not&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant Pandey</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-12824</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant Pandey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-12824</guid>
		<description>As you said that your querry is usefull for  print or reindex,
Can u please tell me Wht is the adavntage and disadvantages of re-indexing and wht is the need to reinedxing. When to reindex your table and WHY???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you said that your querry is usefull for  print or reindex,<br />
Can u please tell me Wht is the adavntage and disadvantages of re-indexing and wht is the need to reinedxing. When to reindex your table and WHY???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2006/11/30/sql-server-cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-6881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlauthority.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/cursor-to-process-tables-in-database-with-static-prefix-and-date-created/#comment-6881</guid>
		<description>Nice explaination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice explaination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
